Suppr超能文献

与其他初级保健场所相比,在联邦政府资助的健康中心就诊的患者的医疗保健利用率和接受预防保健的情况。

Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care.

机构信息

University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 2007, Chicago, IL, 60637.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1498-518. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12178. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare utilization and preventive care receipt among patients of federal Section 330 health centers (HCs) versus patients of other settings.

DATA SOURCES

A nationally representative sample of adults from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2004-2008).

STUDY DESIGN

HC patients were defined as those with ≥50 percent of outpatient visits at HCs in the first panel year. Outcomes included utilization and preventive care receipt from the second panel year. We used negative binomial and logistic regression models with propensity score adjustment for confounding differences between HC and non-HC patients.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Compared to non-HC patients, HC patients had fewer office visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.63) and hospitalizations (aIRR, 0.43) (both p < .001). HC patients were more likely to receive breast cancer screening than non-HC patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.78, p < .01). In subgroup analyses, uninsured HC patients had fewer outpatient and emergency room visits and were more likely to receive dietary advice and breast cancer screening compared to non-HC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Health centers add value to the health care system by providing socially and medically disadvantaged patients with care that results in lower utilization and maintained or improved preventive care.

摘要

目的

比较联邦第 330 节医疗中心(HC)患者与其他医疗机构患者的利用情况和预防保健服务的获得情况。

数据来源

来自医疗支出面板调查(2004-2008 年)的具有全国代表性的成年人样本。

研究设计

HC 患者的定义是在第一个面板年度中至少有 50%的门诊就诊在 HCs 进行的患者。结果包括第二年的利用情况和预防保健服务的获得情况。我们使用负二项和逻辑回归模型,对 HC 和非 HC 患者之间的混杂差异进行倾向评分调整。

主要发现

与非 HC 患者相比,HC 患者的就诊次数(调整后的发病率比[aIRR],0.63)和住院次数(aIRR,0.43)(均<0.001)更少。HC 患者接受乳腺癌筛查的比例高于非 HC 患者(调整后的优势比[aOR],2.78,p<0.01)。在亚组分析中,与非 HC 患者相比,未参保的 HC 患者的门诊和急诊就诊次数更少,更有可能接受饮食建议和乳腺癌筛查。

结论

医疗中心通过为社会和医疗劣势患者提供护理,从而降低利用率并保持或改善预防保健服务,为医疗保健系统增加了价值。

相似文献

2
Use of a Preventive Index to Examine Clinic-Level Factors Associated With Delivery of Preventive Care.
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.016.
4
Using electronic health record data to evaluate preventive service utilization among uninsured safety net patients.
Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:306-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
7
Changes in insurance status and emergency department visits after the 2008 economic downturn.
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/acem.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
8
The role of federally funded health centers in serving the rural population.
J Rural Health. 2003 Spring;19(2):117-24; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00552.x.

引用本文的文献

1
National assessment of health center readiness to train health profession students.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13046-4.
3
Mental health care provision in community health centers and hospital emergency department utilization.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14283. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14283. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
5
Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115895. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
6
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospital-Based Care Among Dual Eligibles Who Use Health Centers.
Health Equity. 2023 Jan 13;7(1):9-18. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0037. eCollection 2023.
9
Employee Engagement in Quality Improvement and Patient Sociodemographic Characteristics in Federally Qualified Health Centers.
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Feb;80(1):43-52. doi: 10.1177/10775587221118157. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):284-303. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12090. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
2
A path forward on Medicare readmissions.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1175-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1300122. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
3
What accountable care organizations will mean for physicians.
BMJ. 2012 Oct 1;345:e6461. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6461.
4
Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures.
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.033.
5
Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):880-91, W312. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424.
6
Achieving excellence in community health centers: implications for health reform.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Feb;23(1):446-59. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0008.
7
Cost savings associated with the use of community health centers.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):50-9. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31823d27b6.
8
Comparative performance of community health centers and other usual sources of primary care.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;34(4):380-90. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31822cbc59.
10
Characteristics of ambulatory care patients and services: a comparison of community health centers and physicians' offices.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Nov;21(4):1169-83. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0928.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验