Suppr超能文献

创伤后疼痛患者使用丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂(Transtec)4年的临床经验回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of 4 years of clinical experience with transdermal buprenorphine (Transtec) in post-traumatic pain.

作者信息

Correa-Illanes Gerardo, Roa Ricardo G, B Piñeros José Luis, Ferrer Flavia T, Adriasola Victoria R

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Hospital del Trabajador de Asociación Chilena de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):181-90. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.9. Epub 2014 May 16.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transdermal buprenorphine (BTDS) in the treatment of post-traumatic pain in a working population.

PATIENTS & METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients with severe post-traumatic pain treated with BTDS between 2008 and 2012.

RESULTS

57 patients were evaluated: 38 men, 19 women (mean age 43 years); patients with burns (n = 22), skin degloving (14), open dislocations (eight), traumatic nerve lesions (six), spinal cord injury (four) and limb amputations (three). 25, 12 and 20 patients experienced neuropathic pain, nociceptive pain or neuropathic/nociceptive pain, respectively. The mean baseline DN4 questionnaire and pain intensity scores were 4.8±2.3 and 7.4±1.5, respectively. The mean duration of pain before BTDS use was 24.4 months (>3 months in 65% of patients). Total patient-years of BTDS treatment were 73. After 14.7±14.9 months of BTDS treatment, mean pain intensity was reduced by 4.2±2.2 points, 38 patients (66.7%) had ≥50% pain relief, 69% reported functional improvement, especially in gait ability (25) and activities of daily life (14), and 46 patients (80.7%) had improved sleep quality. The starting dose of BTDS was 4.4-17.5 μg/h; maintenance dose was 8.8-70 μg/h. At the start of BTDS treatment, all patients used a total of 187 concomitant analgesics daily, 72% of which were stopped during treatment with BTDS; the number of patients that could be managed exclusively with BTDS and rescue analgesia increased to 31%. 13 patients (22%) presented nausea, eight constipation, six local skin reactions, three vomiting and somnolence, and two patients experienced dizziness. Four patients (6.9%) stopped BTDS due to adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

BTDS is an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of patients with severe post-traumatic pain, reducing the intensity of pain and improving functional capacity and quality of sleep.

摘要

目的

评估透皮丁丙诺啡(BTDS)治疗劳动人口创伤后疼痛的有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

回顾性病例系列研究,纳入2008年至2012年间接受BTDS治疗的严重创伤后疼痛患者。

结果

共评估57例患者,其中男性38例,女性19例(平均年龄43岁);烧伤患者22例、皮肤脱套伤14例、开放性脱位8例、创伤性神经损伤6例、脊髓损伤4例、肢体截肢3例。分别有25例、12例和20例患者经历神经性疼痛、伤害性疼痛或神经性/伤害性疼痛。DN4问卷平均基线评分和疼痛强度评分分别为4.8±2.3和7.4±1.5。使用BTDS前疼痛平均持续时间为24.4个月(65%的患者超过3个月)。BTDS治疗的患者总人年数为73。BTDS治疗14.7±14.9个月后,平均疼痛强度降低4.2±2.2分,38例患者(66.7%)疼痛缓解≥50%,69%的患者报告功能改善,尤其是步态能力(25例)和日常生活活动能力(14例),46例患者(80.7%)睡眠质量改善。BTDS起始剂量为4.4 - 17.5μg/h;维持剂量为8.8 - 70μg/h。在BTDS治疗开始时,所有患者每天共使用187种辅助镇痛药,其中72%在BTDS治疗期间停用;仅使用BTDS和急救镇痛药即可控制症状的患者比例增至31%。13例患者(22%)出现恶心,8例便秘,6例局部皮肤反应,3例呕吐和嗜睡以及2例头晕。4例患者(6.9%)因不良反应停用BTDS。

结论

BTDS是治疗严重创伤后疼痛患者的一种有效且安全的选择,可减轻疼痛强度,改善功能能力和睡眠质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验