Suppr超能文献

噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.

作者信息

Musini Vijaya M, Nazer Mark, Bassett Ken, Wright James M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Science Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Although it is established that low-dose thiazides reduce mortality as well as cardiovascular morbidity, the dose-related effect of thiazides in decreasing blood pressure has not been subject to a rigorous systematic review. It is not known whether individual drugs within the thiazide diuretic class differ in their blood pressure-lowering effects and adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose-related decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure due to thiazide diuretics compared with placebo control in the treatment of patients with primary hypertension. Secondary outcomes included the dose-related adverse events leading to patient withdrawal and adverse biochemical effects on serum potassium, uric acid, creatinine, glucose and lipids.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to February 2014), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to February 2014) and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fixed-dose thiazide diuretic monotherapy with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in the treatment of adult patients with primary hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened articles, assessed trial eligibility, extracted data and determined risk of bias. We combined data for continuous variables using a mean difference (MD) and for dichotomous outcomes we calculated the relative risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 randomized, double-blind trials that evaluated the dose-related trough blood pressure-lowering efficacy of six different thiazide diuretics in 11,282 participants treated for a mean duration of eight weeks. The mean age of the participants was 55 years and baseline blood pressure was 158/99 mmHg. Adequate blood pressure-lowering efficacy data were available for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone and indapamide. We judged 54 (90%) included trials to have unclear or high risk of bias, which impacted on our confidence in the results for some of our outcomes.In 33 trials with a baseline blood pressure of 155/100 mmHg, hydrochlorothiazide lowered blood pressure based on dose, with doses of 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, 25 mg and 50 mg/day lowering blood pressure compared to placebo by 4 mmHg (95% CI 2 to 6, moderate-quality evidence)/2 mmHg (95% CI 1 to 4, moderate-quality evidence), 6 mmHg (95% CI 5 to 7, high-quality evidence)/3 mmHg (95% CI 3 to 4, high-quality evidence), 8 mmHg (95% CI 7 to 9, high-quality evidence)/3 mmHg (95% CI 3 to 4, high-quality evidence) and 11 mmHg (95% CI 6 to 15, low-quality evidence)/5 mmHg (95% CI 3 to 7, low-quality evidence), respectively.Direct comparison of doses did not show evidence of dose dependence for blood pressure-lowering for any of the other thiazides for which RCT data were available: bendrofluazide, chlorthalidone, cyclopenthiazide, metolazone or indapamide.In seven trials with a baseline blood pressure of 163/88 mmHg, chlorthalidone at doses of 12.5 mg to 75 mg/day reduced average blood pressure compared to placebo by 12.0 mmHg (95% CI 10 to 14, low-quality evidence)/4 mmHg (95% CI 3 to 5, low-quality evidence).In 10 trials with a baseline blood pressure of 161/98 mmHg, indapamide at doses of 1.0 mg to 5.0 mg/day reduced blood pressure compared to placebo by 9 mmHg (95% CI 7 to 10, low-quality evidence)/4 (95% CI 3 to 5, low-quality evidence).We judged the maximal blood pressure-lowering effect of the different thiazides to be similar. Overall, thiazides reduced average blood pressure compared to placebo by 9 mmHg (95% CI 9 to 10, high-quality evidence)/4 mmHg (95% CI 3 to 4, high-quality evidence).Thiazides as a class have a greater effect on systolic than on diastolic blood pressure, therefore thiazides lower pulse pressure by 4 mmHg to 6 mmHg, an amount that is greater than the 3 mmHg seen with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and renin inhibitors, and the 2 mmHg seen with non-selective beta-blockers. This is based on an informal indirect comparison of results observed in other Cochrane reviews on ACE inhibitors, ARBs and renin inhibitors compared with placebo, which used similar inclusion/exclusion criteria to the present review.Thiazides reduced potassium, increased uric acid and increased total cholesterol and triglycerides. These effects were dose-related and were least for hydrochlorothiazide. Chlorthalidone increased serum glucose but the evidence was unclear for other thiazides. There is a high risk of bias in the metabolic data. This review does not provide a good assessment of the adverse effects of these drugs because there was a high risk of bias in the reporting of withdrawals due to adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that hydrochlorothiazide has a dose-related blood pressure-lowering effect. The mean blood pressure-lowering effect over the dose range 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, 25 mg and 50 mg/day is 4/2 mmHg, 6/3 mmHg, 8/3 mmHg and 11/5 mmHg, respectively. For other thiazide drugs, the lowest doses studied lowered blood pressure maximally and higher doses did not lower it more. Due to the greater effect on systolic than on diastolic blood pressure, thiazides lower pulse pressure by 4 mmHg to 6 mmHg. This exceeds the mean 3 mmHg pulse pressure reduction achieved by ACE inhibitors, ARBs and renin inhibitors, and the 2 mmHg pulse pressure reduction with non-selective beta-blockers as shown in other Cochrane reviews, which compared these antihypertensive drug classes with placebo and used similar inclusion/exclusion criteria.Thiazides did not increase withdrawals due to adverse effects in these short-term trials but there is a high risk of bias for that outcome. Thiazides reduced potassium, increased uric acid and increased total cholesterol and triglycerides.

摘要

背景

高血压是一种可改变的心血管危险因素。虽然已证实小剂量噻嗪类药物可降低死亡率及心血管疾病发病率,但噻嗪类药物降低血压的剂量相关效应尚未经过严格的系统评价。目前尚不清楚噻嗪类利尿剂中的个别药物在降压效果和不良反应方面是否存在差异。

目的

确定与安慰剂对照相比,噻嗪类利尿剂治疗原发性高血压患者时导致的收缩压和/或舒张压的剂量相关降低。次要结局包括导致患者退出的剂量相关不良事件以及对血清钾、尿酸、肌酐、血糖和血脂的不良生化影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL 2014年第1期)、Ovid MEDLINE(1946年至2014年2月)、Ovid EMBASE(1974年至2014年2月)以及ClinicalTrials.gov。

选择标准

我们纳入了双盲、随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了固定剂量噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗与安慰剂治疗原发性高血压成年患者3至12周的疗效。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立筛选文章、评估试验合格性、提取数据并确定偏倚风险。我们使用平均差(MD)合并连续变量的数据,对于二分结局,我们计算相对风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结果

我们纳入了60项随机双盲试验,这些试验评估了6种不同噻嗪类利尿剂在11282名参与者中的剂量相关谷值降压疗效,平均治疗持续时间为8周。参与者的平均年龄为55岁,基线血压为158/99 mmHg。有足够的降压疗效数据可用于氢氯噻嗪、氯噻酮和吲达帕胺。我们判断54项(90%)纳入试验的偏倚风险不明确或较高,这影响了我们对部分结局结果的信心。在33项基线血压为155/100 mmHg的试验中,氢氯噻嗪根据剂量降低血压,与安慰剂相比分别为:6.25 mg、12.5 mg、25 mg和50 mg/天剂量组的收缩压降低4 mmHg(95% CI 2至6,中等质量证据)/舒张压降低2 mmHg(95% CI 1至4,中等质量证据),6 mmHg(95% CI 5至7,高质量证据)/3 mmHg(95% CI 3至4,高质量证据),8 mmHg(95% CI 7至9,高质量证据)/3 mmHg(CI 3至4,高质量证据)和11 mmHg(95% CI 6至15,低质量证据)/5 mmHg(95% CI 3至7,低质量证据)。对于其他有RCT数据的噻嗪类药物:苄氟噻嗪、氯噻酮、环戊噻嗪、美托拉宗或吲达帕胺,剂量直接比较未显示出任何一种药物在降压方面存在剂量依赖性的证据。在7项基线血压为163/88 mmHg的试验中,氯噻酮12.5 mg至75 mg/天剂量组与安慰剂相比平均血压降低12.0 mmHg(95% CI 10至14,低质量证据)/4 mmHg(95% CI 3至5,低质量证据)。在10项基线血压为161/98 mmHg的试验中;吲达帕胺1.0 mg至5.0 mg/天剂量组与安慰剂相比血压降低9 mmHg(95% CI 7至10,低质量证据)/4 mmHg(95% CI 3至5,低质量证据)。我们判断不同噻嗪类药物的最大降压效果相似。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,噻嗪类药物平均血压降低9 mmHg(95% CI 9至10,高质量证据)/4 mmHg(95% CI 3至4,高质量证据)。噻嗪类药物作为一个类别,对收缩压的影响大于舒张压,因此噻嗪类药物使脉压降低4 mmHg至6 mmHg,这一数值大于血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和肾素抑制剂的3 mmHg,以及非选择性β受体阻滞剂的2 mmHg。这是基于在其他Cochrane综述中观察到的结果进行的非正式间接比较,这些综述将ACE抑制剂、ARB和肾素抑制剂与安慰剂进行比较,采用了与本综述相似的纳入/排除标准。噻嗪类药物降低了血钾,升高了尿酸、总胆固醇和甘油三酯。这些效应与剂量相关,且氢氯噻嗪最为轻微。氯噻酮升高了血糖,但其他噻嗪类药物的相关证据不明确。代谢数据存在较高的偏倚风险。本综述对这些药物不良反应的评估不佳,因为不良反应导致退出试验的报告存在较高的偏倚风险。

作者结论

本系统评价表明氢氯噻嗪具有剂量相关的降压作用。在6.25 mg、12.5 mg、25 mg和50 mg/天剂量范围内,平均降压效果分别为4/2 mmHg、6/3 mmHg、8/3 mmHg和11/5 mmHg。对于其他噻嗪类药物,所研究的最低剂量降压效果最大,更高剂量并未进一步降压。由于对收缩压的影响大于舒张压,噻嗪类药物使脉压降低4 mmHg至6 mmHg。这超过了ACE抑制剂、ARB和肾素抑制剂平均降低3 mmHg脉压以及非选择性β受体阻滞剂降低2 mmHg脉压的效果,如其他Cochrane综述所示,这些综述将这些抗高血压药物类别与安慰剂进行比较,并采用了相似的纳入/排除标准。在这些短期试验中噻嗪类药物未增加因不良反应导致的退出,但该结局存在较高的偏倚风险。噻嗪类药物降低了血钾,升高了尿酸、总胆固醇和甘油三酯。

相似文献

1
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.
2
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;4(4):CD007066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub3.
3
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 1;2014(2):CD008117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008117.pub2.
4
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 22;2015(5):CD003825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub4.
5
First-line drugs for hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.
6
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
7
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of partial agonist beta blocker monotherapy for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD007450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2.
8
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
9
Eplerenone for hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2(2):CD008996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008996.pub2.
10
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 22;2014(8):CD009096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009096.pub2.

引用本文的文献

3
Pravastatin for lowering lipids.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 18;9(9):CD013673. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013673.pub2.
5
First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 13;7(7):CD008161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008161.pub3.
6
Thiazide diuretics are back in CKD: the case of chlorthalidone.
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Sep 7;16(1):41-51. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac198. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
RSSDI Guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2022 Oct;42(4):576-605. doi: 10.1007/s13410-022-01143-7. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
9
Thiazide Diuretics and Fracture Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
JBMR Plus. 2022 Oct 7;6(11):e10683. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10683. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
A multi-trial, retrospective analysis of the antihypertensive effects of high-resistance, low-volume inspiratory muscle strength training.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Oct 1;133(4):1001-1010. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00425.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of nonselective beta-blockers for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 28;2014(2):CD007452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007452.pub2.
3
Chlorthalidone: don't call it "thiazide-like" anymore.
Hypertension. 2010 Sep;56(3):335-7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.156166. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
4
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of diuretics as second-line therapy for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007187.pub2.
5
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD003825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub2.
6
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD000028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000028.pub2.
7
First-line drugs for hypertension.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验