Wong Gavin W K, Boyda Heidi N, Wright James M
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD007450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2.
Partial agonists are a subclass of beta blockers used to treat hypertension in many countries. Partial agonist act by stimulating beta receptors when they are quiescent and blocking beta receptors when they are active. The blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of partial agonist beta blockers has not been quantified.
To quantify the dose-related effects of various partial agonists beta blockers on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate versus placebo in patients with primary hypertension.
We searched the Hypertension Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials up to October 2014. The WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) is searched for inclusion in the Group's Specialised Register.
Randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled parallel or cross-over trials. Studies must contain a partial agonist monotherapy arm with fixed dose. Patients enrolled into the studies must have primary hypertension at baseline (defined as SBP/DBP > 140/90 mmHg). Duration of studies must be between three to 12 weeks.
Two authors (GW and HB) confirmed the inclusion of studies and extracted the data independently.
Thirteen randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trials that examined the blood pressure lowering efficacy of six partial agonists in 605 hypertensive patients were included in this review. Five of the included studies were parallel studies and the other eight were cross-over studies. The overall risk of bias is high in this review due to the small sample size and high risk of detection bias. Pindolol, celiprolol and alprenolol lowered SBP and DBP compared to placebo. Acebutolol lowered SBP but there was no clear evidence that it lowered DBP. There was no clear evidence that pindolol and oxprenolol lowered SBP or DBP. Other than for celiprolol, sample sizes were generally small increasing the uncertainty in findings for individual agents versus placebo. In patients with moderate to severe hypertension, partial agonists (considered as a subclass) lowered peak BP by an average of 8 mmHg systolic (95% CI, -10 to -6, very low quality evidence), 4 mmHg diastolic (95%CI, -5 to -3, very low quality evidence) and reduced heart rate by five beats per minute (95%CI, -6 to -4, very low quality evidence). Higher dose partial agonists did not appear to provide additional BP lowering effects compared to lower dose. The maximum BP lowering effect of the overall subclass occurred at the starting dose. Partial agonists reduced pulse pressure by 4 mmHg (95% CI, -5 to -2, very low evidence). Only one study reported withdrawal due to adverse effects, the risk ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.72 (0.07, 7.67).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was very low quality evidence that in patients with moderate to severe hypertension, partial agonists lowered peak BP by an average of 8/4 mmHg and reduced heart rate by five beats per minute. There was no evidence of a greater effect at doses higher than the initial doses. This estimate was probably exaggerated as it was subject to a high risk of bias. Based on the indirect comparison of the results in this review and two Cochrane reviews on angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which also used similar inclusion criteria as this review, the BP lowering effect appeared to be less than the effect in patients with mild to moderate elevated BP who were taking ACE inhibitors and ARBs based on an indirect comparison. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were only reported in one trial so it is impossible to assess the harm of these drugs.
在许多国家,部分激动剂是用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂的一个亚类。部分激动剂在β受体静止时通过刺激β受体起作用,而在β受体活跃时则阻断β受体。部分激动剂β受体阻滞剂的降压效果尚未得到量化。
量化各种部分激动剂β受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压患者收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和心率相对于安慰剂的剂量相关效应。
我们检索了高血压组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、MEDLINE在研数据库、EMBASE和ClinicalTrials.gov,以查找截至2014年10月的随机对照试验。检索世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)以纳入该组的专业注册库。
随机双盲安慰剂对照平行或交叉试验。研究必须包含固定剂量的部分激动剂单药治疗组。纳入研究的患者在基线时必须患有原发性高血压(定义为收缩压/舒张压>140/90 mmHg)。研究持续时间必须在3至12周之间。
两位作者(GW和HB)确认纳入研究并独立提取数据。
本综述纳入了13项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验,这些试验在605例高血压患者中检验了6种部分激动剂的降压疗效。纳入的研究中有5项为平行研究,另外8项为交叉研究。由于样本量小和检测偏倚风险高,本综述中总体偏倚风险较高。与安慰剂相比,吲哚洛尔、塞利洛尔和阿普洛尔降低了收缩压和舒张压。醋丁洛尔降低了收缩压,但没有明确证据表明它降低了舒张压。没有明确证据表明吲哚洛尔和氧烯洛尔降低了收缩压或舒张压。除塞利洛尔外,样本量通常较小,增加了各药物与安慰剂相比结果的不确定性。在中度至重度高血压患者中,部分激动剂(作为一个亚类)使收缩压峰值平均降低8 mmHg(95%CI,-10至-6,极低质量证据),舒张压降低4 mmHg(95%CI,-5至-3,极低质量证据),心率降低每分钟5次(95%CI,-6至-4,极低质量证据)。与低剂量相比,高剂量部分激动剂似乎并未提供额外的降压效果。整个亚类的最大降压效果出现在起始剂量时。部分激动剂使脉压降低4 mmHg(95%CI,-5至-2,极低质量证据)。只有一项研究报告了因不良反应而退出的情况,风险比(95%置信区间)为0.72(0.07,7.67)。
有极低质量证据表明,在中度至重度高血压患者中,部分激动剂使收缩压峰值平均降低8/4 mmHg,心率降低每分钟5次。没有证据表明高于初始剂量时效果会更好。由于该估计存在高偏倚风险,可能被夸大了。基于本综述结果与两项关于血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的Cochrane综述(其也使用了与本综述类似的纳入标准)的间接比较,基于间接比较,与服用ACE抑制剂和ARB的轻度至中度血压升高患者相比,其降压效果似乎较小。仅在一项试验中报告了因不良反应而退出的情况,因此无法评估这些药物的危害。