Xu Xian, Farach-Carson Mary C, Jia Xinqiao
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Departments of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, USA; Center for Translational Cancer Research, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Biotechnol Adv. 2014 Nov 15;32(7):1256-1268. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
Cancer occurs when cells acquire genomic instability and inflammation, produce abnormal levels of epigenetic factors/proteins and tumor suppressors, reprogram the energy metabolism and evade immune destruction, leading to the disruption of cell cycle/normal growth. An early event in carcinogenesis is loss of polarity and detachment from the natural basement membrane, allowing cells to form distinct three-dimensional (3D) structures that interact with each other and with the surrounding microenvironment. Although valuable information has been accumulated from traditional in vitro studies in which cells are grown on flat and hard plastic surfaces (2D culture), this culture condition does not reflect the essential features of tumor tissues. Further, fundamental understanding of cancer metastasis cannot be obtained readily from 2D studies because they lack the complex and dynamic cell-cell communications and cell-matrix interactions that occur during cancer metastasis. These shortcomings, along with lack of spatial depth and cell connectivity, limit the applicability of 2D cultures to accurate testing of pharmacologically active compounds, free or sequestered in nanoparticles. To recapitulate features of native tumor microenvironments, various biomimetic 3D tumor models have been developed to incorporate cancer and stromal cells, relevant matrix components, and biochemical and biophysical cues, into one spatially and temporally integrated system. In this article, we review recent advances in creating 3D tumor models employing tissue engineering principles. We then evaluate the utilities of these novel models for the testing of anticancer drugs and their delivery systems. We highlight the profound differences in responses from 3D in vitro tumors and conventional monolayer cultures. Overall, strategic integration of biological principles and engineering approaches will both improve understanding of tumor progression and invasion and support discovery of more personalized first line treatments for cancer patients.
当细胞获得基因组不稳定性和炎症,产生异常水平的表观遗传因子/蛋白质和肿瘤抑制因子,重新编程能量代谢并逃避免疫破坏,导致细胞周期/正常生长紊乱时,癌症就会发生。致癌作用的早期事件是极性丧失和与天然基底膜脱离,使细胞能够形成相互作用并与周围微环境相互作用的独特三维(3D)结构。尽管从传统的体外研究(细胞在平坦坚硬的塑料表面上生长,即二维培养)中已经积累了有价值的信息,但这种培养条件并不能反映肿瘤组织的基本特征。此外,二维研究无法轻易获得对癌症转移的基本理解,因为它们缺乏癌症转移过程中发生的复杂动态的细胞间通讯和细胞与基质的相互作用。这些缺点,加上缺乏空间深度和细胞连通性,限制了二维培养在准确测试游离或包裹在纳米颗粒中的药理活性化合物方面的适用性。为了重现天然肿瘤微环境的特征,已经开发了各种仿生三维肿瘤模型,将癌细胞和基质细胞、相关基质成分以及生化和生物物理线索整合到一个时空整合的系统中。在本文中,我们回顾了利用组织工程原理创建三维肿瘤模型的最新进展。然后,我们评估这些新型模型在抗癌药物及其递送系统测试中的效用。我们强调了三维体外肿瘤和传统单层培养反应的深刻差异。总体而言,生物学原理和工程方法的战略整合将既有助于增进对肿瘤进展和侵袭的理解,又能支持为癌症患者发现更个性化的一线治疗方法。