Kish Jonathan K, Yu Mandi, Percy-Laurry Antoinette, Altekruse Sean F
Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. Rockville, MD (JKK, MY, AP-L, SFA).
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):236-43. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu020.
Reducing cancer disparities is a major public health objective. Disparities often are discussed in terms of either race and ethnicity or socioeconomic status (SES), without examining interactions between these variables.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 data, excluding Alaska Native and Louisiana registries, from 2002 to 2008, were used to estimate five-year, cause-specific survival by race/ethnicity and census tract SES. Differences in survival between groups were used to assess absolute disparities. Hazard ratios were examined as a measure of relative disparity. Interactions between race/ethnicity and neighborhood SES were evaluated using proportional hazard models.
Survival increased with higher SES for all racial/ethnic groups and generally was higher among non-Hispanic white and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) than non-Hispanic black and Hispanic cases. Absolute disparity in breast cancer survival among non-Hispanic black vs non-Hispanic white cases was slightly larger in low-SES areas than in high-SES areas (7.1% and 6.8%, respectively). In contrast, after adjusting for stage, age, and treatment, risk of mortality among non-Hispanic black cases compared with non-Hispanic white cases was 21% higher in low-SES areas and 64% higher in high-SES areas. Similarly, patterns of absolute and relative disparity compared with non-Hispanic whites differed by SES for Hispanic breast cancer, non-Hispanic black colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer cases. Statistically significant interactions existed between race/ethnicity and SES for colorectal and female breast cancers.
In health disparities research, both relative and absolute measures provide context. A better understanding of the interactions between race/ethnicity and SES may be useful in directing screening and treatment resources toward at-risk populations.
减少癌症差异是一项主要的公共卫生目标。人们经常从种族和族裔或社会经济地位(SES)的角度讨论差异,而没有考察这些变量之间的相互作用。
使用2002年至2008年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-18数据(不包括阿拉斯加原住民和路易斯安那州登记处的数据),按种族/族裔和普查区SES估计五年特定病因生存率。用组间生存率差异评估绝对差异。用风险比作为相对差异的衡量指标。使用比例风险模型评估种族/族裔与邻里SES之间的相互作用。
所有种族/族裔群体的生存率均随SES升高而增加,非西班牙裔白人和亚裔/太平洋岛民(API)的生存率通常高于非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔病例。低SES地区非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人乳腺癌患者的绝对生存差异略大于高SES地区(分别为7.1%和6.8%)。相比之下,在调整分期、年龄和治疗后,低SES地区非西班牙裔黑人患者与非西班牙裔白人患者相比的死亡风险高21%,高SES地区高64%。同样,西班牙裔乳腺癌、非西班牙裔黑人结直肠癌和前列腺癌病例的绝对和相对差异模式与非西班牙裔白人相比因SES而异。结直肠癌和女性乳腺癌在种族/族裔与SES之间存在统计学上的显著相互作用。
在健康差异研究中,相对和绝对指标都能提供背景信息。更好地理解种族/族裔与SES之间的相互作用可能有助于将筛查和治疗资源导向高危人群。