Suppr超能文献

乘积的分布解释了正态理论中介置信区间估计。

The Distribution of the Product Explains Normal Theory Mediation Confidence Interval Estimation.

作者信息

Kisbu-Sakarya Yasemin, MacKinnon David P, Miočević Milica

机构信息

Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 May;49(3):261-268. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.903162.

Abstract

The distribution of the product has several useful applications. One of these applications is its use to form confidence intervals for the indirect effect as the product of 2 regression coefficients. The purpose of this article is to investigate how the moments of the distribution of the product explain normal theory mediation confidence interval coverage and imbalance. Values of the critical ratio for each random variable are used to demonstrate how the moments of the distribution of the product change across values of the critical ratio observed in research studies. Results of the simulation study showed that as skewness in absolute value increases, coverage decreases. And as skewness in absolute value and kurtosis increases, imbalance increases. The difference between testing the significance of the indirect effect using the normal theory versus the asymmetric distribution of the product is further illustrated with a real data example. This article is the first study to show the direct link between the distribution of the product and indirect effect confidence intervals and clarifies the results of previous simulation studies by showing why normal theory confidence intervals for indirect effects are often less accurate than those obtained from the asymmetric distribution of the product or from resampling methods.

摘要

该乘积的分布有几个有用的应用。其中一个应用是用于构建间接效应的置信区间,间接效应是两个回归系数的乘积。本文的目的是研究该乘积分布的矩如何解释正态理论中介置信区间的覆盖率和不平衡性。每个随机变量的临界比的值用于展示该乘积分布的矩如何随着研究中观察到的临界比的值而变化。模拟研究结果表明,随着绝对值偏度的增加,覆盖率降低。并且随着绝对值偏度和峰度的增加,不平衡性增加。通过一个实际数据示例进一步说明了使用正态理论检验间接效应的显著性与该乘积的非对称分布之间的差异。本文是第一项展示乘积分布与间接效应置信区间之间直接联系的研究,并通过说明为什么间接效应的正态理论置信区间通常不如从该乘积的非对称分布或重采样方法获得的置信区间准确,从而阐明了先前模拟研究的结果。

相似文献

1
The Distribution of the Product Explains Normal Theory Mediation Confidence Interval Estimation.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 May;49(3):261-268. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.903162.
2
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):99. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
3
Assessing Mediational Models: Testing and Interval Estimation for Indirect Effects.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2010 Aug 6;45(4):661-701. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.498292.
4
Resampling and Distribution of the Product Methods for Testing Indirect Effects in Complex Models.
Struct Equ Modeling. 2008;15(1):23-51. doi: 10.1080/10705510701758166.
5
Problematic standard errors and confidence intervals for skewness and kurtosis.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):8-17. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0044-x.
6
Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):157-76. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.157.
7
Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(6):600-13. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1040542. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Joint confidence region estimation of L-moment ratios with an extension to right censored data.
J Appl Stat. 2013;40(2):368-379. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2012.744386.
9
SEM-Based Methods to Form Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effect: Still Applicable Given Nonnormality, Under Certain Conditions.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 18;11:571928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571928. eCollection 2020.
10
Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN.
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):384-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193007.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypothesis Tests of Indirect Effects for Multiple Mediators.
Stat Methods Appt. 2025 Mar;34(1):113-127. doi: 10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3
Impact of Ethical Leadership on Employee Engagement: Role of Self-Efficacy and Organizational Commitment.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Aug 25;11(3):962-974. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030071.
4
Comparing Alternative Corrections for Bias in the Bias-Corrected Bootstrap Test of Mediation.
Eval Health Prof. 2021 Dec;44(4):416-427. doi: 10.1177/01632787211024356. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Causal Mediation Analysis in the Presence of Post-treatment Confounding Variables: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 14;11:2067. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02067. eCollection 2020.
6
The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions.
Psychol Methods. 2021 Feb;26(1):1-17. doi: 10.1037/met0000263. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
Confounder detection in linear mediation models: Performance of kernel-based tests of independence.
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):342-359. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01230-4.
8
Bias, Type I Error Rates, and Statistical Power of a Latent Mediation Model in the Presence of Violations of Invariance.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Jun;78(3):460-481. doi: 10.1177/0013164416684169. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
10
A cautionary note on the power of the test for the indirect effect in mediation analysis.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 12;5:1549. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01549. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Explanation of Two Anomalous Results in Statistical Mediation Analysis.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012;47(1):61-87. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.640596.
2
Four applications of permutation methods to testing a single-mediator model.
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Sep;44(3):806-44. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0181-x.
4
RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):692-700. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x.
5
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):99. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
6
A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):41. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3.
7
Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects.
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):425-38. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.425.
9
Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN.
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):384-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验