Kidd John, Howard Annie Green, Highland Heather M, Gordon-Larsen Penny, Bancks Michael Patrick, Carnethon Mercedes, Lin Dan-Yu
Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .
Stat Methods Appt. 2025 Mar;34(1):113-127. doi: 10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
Mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator or mediators. Scenarios that assume a single mediation are often overly simplistic, and analyses that include multiple mediators are becoming more common, particularly with the incorporation of high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, however, little attention has been given to multiple mediator and interaction effects. In this article, we propose new methods for testing the null hypothesis of no indirect effect with multiple mediators and interaction effects. We allow the estimators of the path effects to be possibly correlated; we also consider the practice of using confidence intervals to determine whether a mediation effect is zero. We compare the performance of our proposed method with existing methods through extensive simulation studies. Finally, we provide an application to data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.
中介分析旨在确定一个自变量是直接影响一个反应,还是通过一个或多个中介变量间接影响该反应。假设单一中介作用的情形往往过于简单化,而包含多个中介变量的分析正变得越来越普遍,尤其是在纳入高维数据的情况下。然而,令人惊讶的是,对于多个中介变量和交互效应的关注却很少。在本文中,我们提出了新的方法来检验不存在多个中介变量和交互效应时的间接效应零假设。我们允许路径效应的估计量可能相关;我们还考虑了使用置信区间来确定中介效应是否为零的做法。通过广泛的模拟研究,我们将所提出方法的性能与现有方法进行了比较。最后,我们提供了一个应用于青年成人冠状动脉风险发展(CARDIA)研究数据的实例。