Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.
Brittany Melanoma Network, GRoupe Ouest Mélanome (GROUM), Rennes, France.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Aug;29(8):1530-8. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12910. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
Mutations of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT oncogenes are preferentially described in certain histological subtypes of melanoma and linked to specific histopathological features. BRAF-, MEK- and KIT-inhibitors led to improvement in overall survival of patients harbouring mutated metastatic melanoma.
To assess the prevalence and types of BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT and MITF mutations in cutaneous and mucous melanoma and to correlate mutation status with clinicopathological features and outcome.
Clinicopathological features and mutation status of 108 samples and of 98 consecutive patients were, respectively, assessed in one retrospective and one prospective study. Clinicopathological features were correlated with mutation status and the predictive value of these mutations was studied.
This work identified significant correlations between BRAF mutations and melanoma occurring on non-chronic sun-damaged skin and superficial spreading melanoma (P < 0.05) on one hand, and between NRAS mutations and nodular melanoma (P < 0.05) on the other hand. Younger age (P < 0.05), microscopic (P < 0.05) and macroscopic (P < 0.05) lymphatic involvement at diagnosis of primary melanoma were significantly linked to BRAF mutations. A mutated status was a positive predictive factor of a response to BRAF inhibitors (OR = 3.44). Mutated melanoma showed a significantly (P = 0.038) higher objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy (26.3%) than wild-type tumours (6.7%).
Clinical and pathological characteristics of the primary melanoma differed between wild-type and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated tumours. Patients with BRAF-mutated tumours were younger at diagnosis of primary melanoma. Patients carrying mutations showed better responses better to specific kinase inhibitors and interestingly also to systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy.
BRAF、NRAS 和 c-KIT 癌基因突变在某些黑色素瘤的组织学亚型中更为常见,与特定的组织病理学特征相关。BRAF、MEK 和 KIT 抑制剂的应用改善了携带突变转移性黑色素瘤患者的总体生存。
评估 BRAF、NRAS、c-KIT 和 MITF 突变在皮肤和黏膜黑色素瘤中的发生率和类型,并将突变状态与临床病理特征和结局相关联。
分别在一项回顾性和一项前瞻性研究中评估了 108 例样本和 98 例连续患者的临床病理特征和突变状态,评估了临床病理特征与突变状态的相关性,并研究了这些突变的预测价值。
这项工作确定了 BRAF 突变与非慢性日光损伤皮肤和浅表扩散性黑色素瘤上发生的黑色素瘤之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.05),NRAS 突变与结节性黑色素瘤之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.05)。年轻患者(P < 0.05)、原发黑色素瘤诊断时的微观(P < 0.05)和宏观(P < 0.05)淋巴管受累与 BRAF 突变显著相关。突变状态是 BRAF 抑制剂反应的阳性预测因子(OR = 3.44)。突变型黑色素瘤对细胞毒性化疗的客观缓解率明显高于野生型肿瘤(26.3%对 6.7%)(P = 0.038)。
野生型和 BRAF 或 NRAS 突变型肿瘤的原发性黑色素瘤的临床和病理特征不同。原发性黑色素瘤诊断时,BRAF 突变型患者更年轻。携带突变的患者对特定的激酶抑制剂和有趣的细胞毒性化疗有更好的反应。