Lyle Megan, Haydu Lauren E, Menzies Alexander M, Thompson John F, Saw Robyn P M, Spillane Andrew J, Kefford Richard F, Mann Graham J, Cooper Wendy A, Yu Bing, Scolyer Richard A, O'Toole Sandra A, Long Georgina V
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Liz Plummer Cancer Centre, Cairns, Qld, Australia.
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pathology. 2016 Feb;48(2):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
Targeted therapy directed at driver oncogenic mutations offers an effective treatment option for select patients with metastatic melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of clinically significant somatic mutations, specifically BRAF, NRAS and KIT, in a large cohort of Australian patients with metastatic melanoma. We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of consecutive patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIIc unresectable or stage IV melanoma managed at Melanoma Institute Australia, and affiliated sites, that underwent molecular testing between 22 June 2009 and 19 July 2013. Additionally, we examined the change in BRAF testing methodology and patient population over time, and how this influenced the prevalence of mutations. A total of 767 molecular tests were conducted for 733 patients. BRAF V600 mutation testing was performed for 713 patients (97.2%), with an overall mutation prevalence of 37.7% (269/713); 74.3% (200/269) were the V600E genotype and 22.3% (60/269) V600K. The BRAF mutation prevalence and proportion of BRAF V600E and V600K genotypes varied across the study period, as did testing methodology and the median age of the cohorts. Of 222 patients who underwent NRAS testing, 58 (26.1%) had a mutation identified. The overall prevalence of KIT mutations was 3.7% (11/296). In Australia the prevalence of BRAF mutations is lower than initially reported, although this remains the most common mutation identified in metastatic melanoma and an important therapeutic target. NRAS mutations are more prevalent than initially described; however, other mutations reported in melanoma, including KIT, are rare in an unselected population of patients.
针对驱动致癌突变的靶向治疗为部分转移性黑色素瘤患者提供了一种有效的治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估一大批澳大利亚转移性黑色素瘤患者中具有临床意义的体细胞突变,特别是BRAF、NRAS和KIT突变的患病率。我们对在澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所及其附属机构接受治疗的连续美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)IIIc期不可切除或IV期黑色素瘤患者进行了一项横断面队列研究,这些患者在2009年6月22日至2013年7月19日期间接受了分子检测。此外,我们研究了BRAF检测方法和患者群体随时间的变化,以及这如何影响突变的患病率。共对733名患者进行了767次分子检测。对713名患者(97.2%)进行了BRAF V600突变检测,总体突变患病率为37.7%(269/713);74.3%(200/269)为V600E基因型,22.3%(60/269)为V600K基因型。BRAF突变患病率以及BRAF V600E和V600K基因型的比例在研究期间有所变化,检测方法和各队列的中位年龄也如此。在接受NRAS检测的222名患者中,有58名(26.1%)检测到突变。KIT突变的总体患病率为3.7%(11/296)。在澳大利亚,BRAF突变的患病率低于最初报告的水平,尽管它仍然是转移性黑色素瘤中最常见的突变且是一个重要的治疗靶点。NRAS突变比最初描述的更为普遍;然而,在未经过选择的患者群体中,黑色素瘤中报告的其他突变,包括KIT突变,很罕见。