Nordin Joel Z, Lee Yi, Vader Pieter, Mäger Imre, Johansson Henrik J, Heusermann Wolf, Wiklander Oscar P B, Hällbrink Mattias, Seow Yiqi, Bultema Jarred J, Gilthorpe Jonathan, Davies Tim, Fairchild Paul J, Gabrielsson Susanne, Meisner-Kober Nicole C, Lehtiö Janne, Smith C I Edvard, Wood Matthew J A, El Andaloussi Samir
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nanomedicine. 2015 May;11(4):879-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are natural nanoparticles that mediate intercellular transfer of RNA and proteins and are of great medical interest; serving as novel biomarkers and potential therapeutic agents. However, there is little consensus on the most appropriate method to isolate high-yield and high-purity EVs from various biological fluids. Here, we describe a systematic comparison between two protocols for EV purification: ultrafiltration with subsequent liquid chromatography (UF-LC) and differential ultracentrifugation (UC). A significantly higher EV yield resulted from UF-LC as compared to UC, without affecting vesicle protein composition. Importantly, we provide novel evidence that, in contrast to UC-purified EVs, the biophysical properties of UF-LC-purified EVs are preserved, leading to a different in vivo biodistribution, with less accumulation in lungs. Finally, we show that UF-LC is scalable and adaptable for EV isolation from complex media types such as stem cell media, which is of huge significance for future clinical applications involving EVs.
Recent evidence suggests extracellular vesicles (EVs) as another route of cellular communication. These EVs may be utilized for future therapeutics. In this article, the authors compared ultrafiltration with size-exclusion liquid chromatography (UF-LC) and ultra-centrifugation (UC) for EV recovery.
细胞外囊泡(EVs)是天然纳米颗粒,介导RNA和蛋白质的细胞间转移,具有重大医学意义;可作为新型生物标志物和潜在治疗剂。然而,对于从各种生物流体中分离高产率和高纯度EVs的最合适方法,目前几乎没有共识。在此,我们描述了两种EV纯化方案的系统比较:超滤后接液相色谱法(UF-LC)和差速超速离心法(UC)。与UC相比,UF-LC产生的EV产量显著更高,且不影响囊泡蛋白质组成。重要的是,我们提供了新的证据,与UC纯化的EVs相比,UF-LC纯化的EVs的生物物理特性得以保留,导致体内生物分布不同,在肺部的积累较少。最后,我们表明UF-LC可扩展并适用于从复杂培养基类型(如干细胞培养基)中分离EVs,这对未来涉及EVs的临床应用具有重大意义。
最近的证据表明细胞外囊泡(EVs)是细胞间通讯的另一种途径。这些EVs可能用于未来的治疗。在本文中,作者比较了超滤结合尺寸排阻液相色谱法(UF-LC)和超速离心法(UC)用于EV回收的效果。