Pleus Stefan, Schoemaker Michael, Morgenstern Karin, Schmelzeisen-Redeker Günther, Haug Cornelia, Link Manuela, Zschornack Eva, Freckmann Guido
Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):801-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296815578716. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is often assessed with respect to blood glucose (BG) readings. CGM readings are affected by a physiological and a technical time delay when compared to BG readings. In this analysis, the dependence of CGM performance parameters on the BG rate of change was investigated for 2 CGM systems.
Data from a previously published study were retrospectively analyzed. An established CGM system (Dexcom G4, Dexcom, San Diego, CA; system A) and a prototype system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany; system B) with 2 sensors each were worn by 10 subjects in parallel. Glucose swings were induced to achieve rapidly changing BG concentrations. Mean absolute relative differences (MARD) were calculated in different BG rate-of-change categories. In addition, sensor-to-sensor precision was assessed.
At BG rates of change of -1 mg/dl/min to 0 mg/dl/min and 0 mg/dl/min to +1 mg/dl/min, MARD results were 12.6% and 11.3% for system A and 8.2% and 10.0% for system B. At rapidly changing BG concentrations (<-3 mg/dl/min and ≥+3 mg/dl/min), higher MARD results were found for both systems, but system B was less affected (system A: 24.9% and 29.6%, system B: 10.6% and 16.3%). The impact of rate of change on sensor-to-sensor precision was less pronounced.
Both systems were affected by rapidly changing BG concentrations to some degree, although system B was mostly unaffected by decreasing BG concentrations. It would seem that technological advancements in CGM systems might allow for a more precise tracking of BG concentrations even at rapidly changing BG concentrations.
连续血糖监测(CGM)系统的准确性通常根据血糖(BG)读数进行评估。与BG读数相比,CGM读数受到生理和技术时间延迟的影响。在本分析中,研究了两种CGM系统的CGM性能参数对BG变化率的依赖性。
对先前发表的一项研究的数据进行回顾性分析。10名受试者同时佩戴了一套已上市的CGM系统(德康G4,德康公司,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥;系统A)和一套原型系统(罗氏诊断有限公司,德国曼海姆;系统B),每套系统配有2个传感器。通过诱导血糖波动来实现快速变化的BG浓度。计算不同BG变化率类别下的平均绝对相对差异(MARD)。此外,还评估了传感器间的精密度。
在BG变化率为-1 mg/dl/分钟至0 mg/dl/分钟以及0 mg/dl/分钟至+1 mg/dl/分钟时,系统A的MARD结果分别为12.6%和11.3%,系统B的MARD结果分别为8.2%和10.0%。在BG浓度快速变化时(<-3 mg/dl/分钟和≥+3 mg/dl/分钟),两个系统的MARD结果均较高,但系统B受影响较小(系统A:24.9%和29.6%,系统B:10.6%和16.3%)。变化率对传感器间精密度的影响不太明显。
两种系统在一定程度上均受到BG浓度快速变化的影响,尽管系统B在BG浓度降低时基本不受影响。CGM系统的技术进步似乎可能使即使在BG浓度快速变化时也能更精确地跟踪BG浓度。