Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):341-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60933-3. Epub 2015 May 18.
Meta-analyses of previous randomised controlled trials concluded that the smooth muscle relaxant drugs tamsulosin and nifedipine assisted stone passage for people managed expectantly for ureteric colic, but emphasised the need for high-quality trials with wide inclusion criteria. We aimed to fulfil this need by testing effectiveness of these drugs in a standard clinical care setting.
For this multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited adults (aged 18-65 years) undergoing expectant management for a single ureteric stone identified by CT at 24 UK hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned by a remote randomisation system to tamsulosin 400 μg, nifedipine 30 mg, or placebo taken daily for up to 4 weeks, using an algorithm with centre, stone size (≤5 mm or >5 mm), and stone location (upper, mid, or lower ureter) as minimisation covariates. Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who did not need further intervention for stone clearance within 4 weeks of randomisation, analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population defined as all eligible patients for whom we had primary outcome data. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT number 2010-019469-26, and as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number 69423238.
Between Jan 11, 2011, and Dec 20, 2013, we randomly assigned 1167 participants, 1136 (97%) of whom were included in the primary analysis (17 were excluded because of ineligibility and 14 participants were lost to follow-up). 303 (80%) of 379 participants in the placebo group did not need further intervention by 4 weeks, compared with 307 (81%) of 378 in the tamsulosin group (adjusted risk difference 1·3% [95% CI -5·7 to 8·3]; p=0·73) and 304 (80%) of 379 in the nifedipine group (0·5% [-5·6 to 6·5]; p=0·88). No difference was noted between active treatment and placebo (p=0·78), or between tamsulosin and nifedipine (p=0·77). Serious adverse events were reported in three participants in the nifedipine group (one had right loin pain, diarrhoea, and vomiting; one had malaise, headache, and chest pain; and one had severe chest pain, difficulty breathing, and left arm pain) and in one participant in the placebo group (headache, dizziness, lightheadedness, and chronic abdominal pain).
Tamsulosin 400 μg and nifedipine 30 mg are not effective at decreasing the need for further treatment to achieve stone clearance in 4 weeks for patients with expectantly managed ureteric colic.
UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
先前的随机对照试验的荟萃分析得出结论,平滑肌松弛剂坦索罗辛和硝苯地平有助于输尿管绞痛患者的结石排出,但强调需要进行高质量的试验,纳入广泛的标准。我们旨在通过在标准临床护理环境中测试这些药物的有效性来满足这一需求。
这项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验招募了在 24 家英国医院通过 CT 检查发现的单一输尿管结石的成年人(年龄 18-65 岁),正在接受预期管理。参与者通过远程随机化系统以中心、结石大小(≤5 毫米或>5 毫米)和结石位置(上、中、下输尿管)为最小化协变量,随机分配至坦索罗辛 400μg、硝苯地平 30mg 或安慰剂,每天服用一次,最多 4 周。参与者、临床医生和试验人员对治疗分配进行了盲法。主要结局是在随机分组后 4 周内不需要进一步治疗以清除结石的参与者比例,在修改后的意向治疗人群中进行分析,该人群定义为所有符合条件且我们有主要结局数据的患者。该试验在欧洲临床试验数据库中注册,EudraCT 编号 2010-019469-26,并作为国际标准随机对照试验,编号 69423238。
2011 年 1 月 11 日至 2013 年 12 月 20 日期间,我们随机分配了 1167 名参与者,其中 1136 名(97%)参与者纳入主要分析(17 名因不符合条件而被排除,14 名参与者失访)。安慰剂组中 303 名(80%)参与者在 4 周内不需要进一步干预,而坦索罗辛组中 307 名(81%)(调整风险差异 1.3%[95%CI-5.7 至 8.3];p=0.73)和硝苯地平组中 304 名(80%)(0.5%[-5.6 至 6.5];p=0.88)。与安慰剂相比,活性药物治疗与安慰剂之间无差异(p=0.78),或坦索罗辛与硝苯地平之间无差异(p=0.77)。硝苯地平组有 3 名参与者(1 名出现右腰背部疼痛、腹泻和呕吐;1 名出现不适、头痛和胸痛;1 名出现严重胸痛、呼吸困难和左臂疼痛)和安慰剂组有 1 名参与者报告了严重不良事件(头痛、头晕、头晕和慢性腹痛)。
坦索罗辛 400μg 和硝苯地平 30mg 并不能有效降低输尿管绞痛患者在 4 周内需要进一步治疗以清除结石的需求。
英国国家卫生研究院健康技术评估计划。