Suppr超能文献

德国痴呆症筛查呈阳性的初级护理患者的正规护理、非正规护理及生产力损失的经济分析

Economic Analysis of Formal Care, Informal Care, and Productivity Losses in Primary Care Patients who Screened Positive for Dementia in Germany.

作者信息

Michalowsky Bernhard, Thyrian Jochen René, Eichler Tilly, Hertel Johannes, Wucherer Diana, Flessa Steffen, Hoffmann Wolfgang

机构信息

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Department of General Business Administration and Health Care Management, Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(1):47-59. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150600.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of people with dementia (PwD) live at home and require professional formal care and informal care that is generally provided by close relatives.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utilization and costs of formal and informal care for PwD, indirect costs because of productivity losses of caregivers, and the associations between cost, socio-demographic and clinical variables.

METHODS

The analysis includes the data of 262 community-dwelling PwD and their caregivers. Socio-demographics, clinical variables, and the utilization of formal care were assessed within the baseline assessment. To evaluate informal care costs, the Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) questionnaire was used. Costs were calculated from a social perspective. Associations were evaluated using multiple linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Formal care services were utilized less (26.3%) than informal care (85.1%), resulting in a cost ratio of one to ten(1,646 €; 16,473 €, respectively). In total, 29% of caregivers were employed, and every seventh (14.3%) experienced productivity losses, which corresponded to 1,258 € annually. Whereas increasing deficits in daily living activities were associated with higher formal and higher informal costs, living alone was significantly associated with higher formal care costs and the employment of a caregiver was associated with lower informal care costs.

CONCLUSION

Informal care contributes the most to total care costs. Living alone is a major cost driver for formal costs because of the lower availability of potential informal care. The availability of informal care is limited and productivity losses are increased when a caregiver is employed.

摘要

背景

大多数痴呆症患者居家生活,需要专业的正式照护以及通常由近亲提供的非正式照护。

目的

确定痴呆症患者正式照护和非正式照护的利用情况及成本、照护者生产力损失导致的间接成本,以及成本、社会人口统计学和临床变量之间的关联。

方法

分析纳入了262名社区居住的痴呆症患者及其照护者的数据。在基线评估中对社会人口统计学、临床变量和正式照护的利用情况进行了评估。为评估非正式照护成本,使用了痴呆症资源利用(RUD)问卷。成本从社会角度进行计算。使用多元线性和逻辑回归模型评估关联。

结果

正式照护服务的利用率(26.3%)低于非正式照护(85.1%),成本比为1比10(分别为1646欧元和16473欧元)。总体而言,29%的照护者有工作,每七分之一(14.3%)的照护者经历了生产力损失,相当于每年1258欧元。日常生活活动能力缺陷增加与更高的正式照护成本和更高的非正式照护成本相关,独居与更高的正式照护成本显著相关,照护者有工作与更低的非正式照护成本相关。

结论

非正式照护对总照护成本的贡献最大。独居是正式成本的主要驱动因素,因为潜在非正式照护的可获得性较低。非正式照护的可获得性有限,当照护者有工作时生产力损失会增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验