Elena Bandieri and Fabrizio Artioli, Unità Sanitaria Locale, Modena; Marilena Romero, Daniela Sichetti, Caterina Fanizza, and Gianni Tognoni, Fondazione Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Chieti; Carla Ida Ripamonti, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan; Daniele Santini, Unità di Oncologia Medica, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome; Luigi Cavanna, Ospedale di Piacenza, Piacenza; Barbara Melotti, Unità di Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna; Pier Franco Conte, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Università di Padova, Padova; Fausto Roila, Ospedale "S.Maria", Terni; Stefano Cascinu, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona; Mario Luppi, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, Modena, Italy; and Eduardo Bruera, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):436-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.0733. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
The WHO guidelines on cancer pain management recommend a sequential three-step analgesic ladder. However, conclusive data are lacking as to whether moderate pain should be treated with either step II weak opioids or low-dose step III strong opioids.
In a multicenter, 28-day, open-label randomized controlled study, adults with moderate cancer pain were assigned to receive either a weak opioid or low-dose morphine. The primary outcome was the number of responder patients, defined as patients with a 20% reduction in pain intensity on the numerical rating scale.
A total of 240 patients with cancer (118 in the low-dose morphine and 122 in the weak-opioid group) were included in the study. The primary outcome occurred in 88.2% of the low-dose morphine and in 57.7% of the weak-opioid group (odds risk, 6.18; 95% CI, 3.12 to 12.24; P < .001). The percentage of responder patients was higher in the low-dose morphine group, as early as at 1 week. Clinically meaningful (≥ 30%) and highly meaningful (≥ 50%) pain reduction from baseline was significantly higher in the low-dose morphine group (P < .001). A change in the assigned treatment occurred more frequently in the weak-opioid group, because of inadequate analgesia. The general condition of patients, which was based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System overall symptom score, was better in the morphine group. Adverse effects were similar in both groups.
In patients with cancer and moderate pain, low-dose morphine reduced pain intensity significantly compared with weak opioids, with a similarly good tolerability and an earlier effect.
世界卫生组织(WHO)癌症疼痛管理指南推荐使用三阶梯镇痛方案。然而,对于中度疼痛是否应该使用第二阶梯弱阿片类药物或低剂量第三阶梯强阿片类药物治疗,目前尚无确凿数据。
在一项多中心、28 天、开放性、随机对照研究中,将患有中度癌痛的成年人分为接受弱阿片类药物或低剂量吗啡治疗。主要结局是应答患者的数量,定义为数字评分量表上疼痛强度降低 20%的患者。
共有 240 例癌症患者(低剂量吗啡组 118 例,弱阿片类药物组 122 例)纳入研究。低剂量吗啡组和弱阿片类药物组的主要结局分别为 88.2%和 57.7%(优势比,6.18;95%置信区间,3.12 至 12.24;P<0.001)。低剂量吗啡组应答患者的比例更高,早在第 1 周就更高。从基线开始,低剂量吗啡组患者的疼痛缓解程度具有临床意义(≥30%)和高度意义(≥50%),明显高于弱阿片类药物组(P<0.001)。由于镇痛不足,弱阿片类药物组更频繁地改变治疗方案。根据埃德蒙顿症状评估系统总体症状评分,患者的一般状况在吗啡组更好。两组的不良反应相似。
在患有中度疼痛的癌症患者中,与弱阿片类药物相比,低剂量吗啡可显著降低疼痛强度,且具有相似的良好耐受性和更早的效果。