Suppr超能文献

南卡罗来纳州改善儿童保健营养政策的比较评估。

Comparative Evaluation of a South Carolina Policy to Improve Nutrition in Child Care.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jun;116(6):949-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.10.026. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policies to promote healthy eating in young children appear promising, but are largely untested. Recently, South Carolina implemented mandatory nutrition standards governing child-care centers serving low-income children.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated consistency with the standards before and after the policy took effect.

DESIGN

This study evaluated consistency with the nutrition standards in South Carolina, using North Carolina-a state not making policy changes-as the comparison. The research team conducted assessments in a longitudinal sample of centers and a cross-sectional sample of children before and approximately 9 months after the standards took effect.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Trained observers recorded foods and beverages served to 102 children from 34 centers in South Carolina and 90 children from 30 centers in North Carolina at baseline. At follow-up, the research team observed 99 children from 33 centers in South Carolina and 78 children from 26 centers in North Carolina.

INTERVENTION

The policy was implemented in April 2012 and included 13 standards governing the nutritional quality of foods and beverages served to children, and staff behaviors related to feeding children in care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome was consistency with each standard at follow-up in South Carolina compared with North Carolina, controlling for baseline consistency and other covariates.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Logistic regressions were conducted to evaluate consistency with each standard, adjusting for baseline and potential confounders.

RESULTS

Compared with North Carolina, centers in South Carolina were more likely to be consistent with the standard prohibiting the use of food as a reward or punishment (odds ratio=1.22; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.61; P=0.03). Two centers in South Carolina met all 13 standards at follow-up compared with none in North Carolina. No other differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

New standards modestly improved nutrition practices in South Carolina child-care centers, but additional support is needed to bring all centers into compliance with the current policies.

摘要

背景

促进幼儿健康饮食的政策似乎很有前景,但在很大程度上尚未经过检验。最近,南卡罗来纳州实施了强制性营养标准,对为低收入儿童服务的儿童保育中心进行管理。

目的

本研究评估该政策生效前后与标准的一致性。

设计

本研究使用北卡罗来纳州(未进行政策改革的州)作为比较,评估了南卡罗来纳州的营养标准一致性。研究团队在标准生效前后,对一个长期的中心样本和一个儿童的横断面样本进行了评估。

参与者/设置:训练有素的观察者记录了南卡罗来纳州 34 个中心的 102 名儿童和北卡罗来纳州 30 个中心的 90 名儿童在基线时所食用的食物和饮料。在随访时,研究团队观察了南卡罗来纳州 33 个中心的 99 名儿童和北卡罗来纳州 26 个中心的 78 名儿童。

干预措施

该政策于 2012 年 4 月实施,包括 13 项标准,规定了为儿童提供的食物和饮料的营养质量,以及与儿童在保育中心进食相关的工作人员行为。

主要观察结果

在南卡罗来纳州,与北卡罗来纳州相比,在控制了基线一致性和其他混杂因素后,随访时每个标准的一致性为主要观察结果。

统计分析

进行逻辑回归分析,以评估与每个标准的一致性,同时调整基线和潜在的混杂因素。

结果

与北卡罗来纳州相比,南卡罗来纳州的中心更有可能遵守禁止将食物作为奖励或惩罚的标准(优势比=1.22;95%置信区间 1.11 至 1.61;P=0.03)。与北卡罗来纳州的零相比,南卡罗来纳州有两个中心在随访时符合所有 13 项标准。未观察到其他差异。

结论

新的标准适度改善了南卡罗来纳州儿童保育中心的营养实践,但需要额外的支持,以使所有中心都符合当前政策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验