Suppr超能文献

韩国成年人中马丁法估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的验证:来自2009 - 2011年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查的结果

Validation of the Martin Method for Estimating Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Korean Adults: Findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2011.

作者信息

Lee Jongseok, Jang Sungok, Son Heejeong

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.

Korea Association of Health Promotion Gwangju-Jeonnam Branch, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0148147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148147. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Despite the importance of accurate assessment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the Friedewald formula has primarily been used as a cost-effective method to estimate LDL-C when triglycerides are less than 400 mg/dL. In a recent study, an alternative to the formula was proposed to improve estimation of LDL-C. We evaluated the performance of the novel method versus the Friedewald formula using a sample of 5,642 Korean adults with LDL-C measured by an enzymatic homogeneous assay (LDL-CD). Friedewald LDL-C (LDL-CF) was estimated using a fixed factor of 5 for the ratio of triglycerides to very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG:VLDL-C ratio). However, the novel LDL-C (LDL-CN) estimates were calculated using the N-strata-specific median TG:VLDL-C ratios, LDL-C5 and LDL-C25 from respective ratios derived from our data set, and LDL-C180 from the 180-cell table reported by the original study. Compared with LDL-CF, each LDL-CN estimate exhibited a significantly higher overall concordance in the NCEP-ATP III guideline classification with LDL-CD (p< 0.001 for each comparison). Overall concordance was 78.2% for LDL-CF, 81.6% for LDL-C5, 82.3% for LDL-C25, and 82.0% for LDL-C180. Compared to LDL-C5, LDL-C25 significantly but slightly improved overall concordance (p = 0.008). LDL-C25 and LDL-C180 provided almost the same overall concordance; however, LDL-C180 achieved superior improvement in classifying LDL-C < 70 mg/dL compared to the other estimates. In subjects with triglycerides of 200 to 399 mg/dL, each LDL-CN estimate showed a significantly higher concordance than that of LDL-CF (p< 0.001 for each comparison). The novel method offers a significant improvement in LDL-C estimation when compared with the Friedewald formula. However, it requires further modification and validation considering the racial differences as well as the specific character of the applied measuring method.

摘要

尽管准确评估低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)很重要,但当甘油三酯水平低于400mg/dL时,Friedewald公式主要被用作一种经济有效的方法来估算LDL-C。在最近的一项研究中,有人提出了该公式的替代方法以改进LDL-C的估算。我们使用5642名韩国成年人的样本评估了这种新方法与Friedewald公式的性能,这些成年人的LDL-C通过酶法均相测定(LDL-CD)进行测量。Friedewald LDL-C(LDL-CF)使用甘油三酯与极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇之比(TG:VLDL-C比)的固定因子5进行估算。然而,新的LDL-C(LDL-CN)估算值是使用N分层特定的TG:VLDL-C中位数比率、根据我们的数据集得出的各自比率中的LDL-C5和LDL-C25,以及原始研究报告的180单元格表中的LDL-C180来计算的。与LDL-CF相比,每个LDL-CN估算值在NCEP-ATP III指南分类中与LDL-CD的总体一致性显著更高(每次比较p<0.001)。LDL-CF的总体一致性为78.2%,LDL-C5为81.6%,LDL-C25为82.3%,LDL-C180为82.0%。与LDL-C5相比,LDL-C25显著但略有提高了总体一致性(p = 0.008)。LDL-C25和LDL-C180提供了几乎相同的总体一致性;然而,与其他估算值相比,LDL-C180在将LDL-C分类为<70mg/dL方面有更好的改进。在甘油三酯水平为200至399mg/dL的受试者中,每个LDL-CN估算值的一致性都显著高于LDL-CF(每次比较p<0.001)。与Friedewald公式相比,这种新方法在LDL-C估算方面有显著改进。然而,考虑到种族差异以及所应用测量方法的特殊性,它需要进一步修改和验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe0f/4732787/2cda7074c560/pone.0148147.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验