Suppr超能文献

革兰氏染色错误率的多中心评估

Multicenter Assessment of Gram Stain Error Rates.

作者信息

Samuel Linoj P, Balada-Llasat Joan-Miquel, Harrington Amanda, Cavagnolo Robert

机构信息

Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jun;54(6):1442-1447. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03066-15. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

Abstract

Gram stains remain the cornerstone of diagnostic testing in the microbiology laboratory for the guidance of empirical treatment prior to availability of culture results. Incorrectly interpreted Gram stains may adversely impact patient care, and yet there are no comprehensive studies that have evaluated the reliability of the technique and there are no established standards for performance. In this study, clinical microbiology laboratories at four major tertiary medical care centers evaluated Gram stain error rates across all nonblood specimen types by using standardized criteria. The study focused on several factors that primarily contribute to errors in the process, including poor specimen quality, smear preparation, and interpretation of the smears. The number of specimens during the evaluation period ranged from 976 to 1,864 specimens per site, and there were a total of 6,115 specimens. Gram stain results were discrepant from culture for 5% of all specimens. Fifty-eight percent of discrepant results were specimens with no organisms reported on Gram stain but significant growth on culture, while 42% of discrepant results had reported organisms on Gram stain that were not recovered in culture. Upon review of available slides, 24% (63/263) of discrepant results were due to reader error, which varied significantly based on site (9% to 45%). The Gram stain error rate also varied between sites, ranging from 0.4% to 2.7%. The data demonstrate a significant variability between laboratories in Gram stain performance and affirm the need for ongoing quality assessment by laboratories. Standardized monitoring of Gram stains is an essential quality control tool for laboratories and is necessary for the establishment of a quality benchmark across laboratories.

摘要

革兰氏染色仍然是微生物学实验室诊断检测的基石,用于在培养结果出来之前指导经验性治疗。革兰氏染色的错误解读可能会对患者护理产生不利影响,然而,目前尚无全面的研究评估该技术的可靠性,也没有既定的操作标准。在本研究中,四个主要三级医疗中心的临床微生物学实验室使用标准化标准评估了所有非血液标本类型的革兰氏染色错误率。该研究聚焦于几个主要导致该过程中出现错误的因素,包括标本质量差、涂片制备以及涂片解读。评估期间每个站点的标本数量从976到1864个不等,总共6115个标本。所有标本中有5%的革兰氏染色结果与培养结果不一致。58%的不一致结果是革兰氏染色报告无微生物但培养有显著生长的标本,而42%的不一致结果是革兰氏染色报告有微生物但培养未检出的标本。在查看可用玻片后,24%(63/263)的不一致结果是由于阅片者错误,不同站点之间差异显著(9%至45%)。革兰氏染色错误率在不同站点之间也有所不同,范围从0.4%到2.7%。数据表明各实验室在革兰氏染色操作方面存在显著差异,并肯定了实验室持续进行质量评估的必要性。对革兰氏染色进行标准化监测是实验室必不可少的质量控制工具,也是在各实验室之间建立质量基准所必需的。

相似文献

1
Multicenter Assessment of Gram Stain Error Rates.
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jun;54(6):1442-1447. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03066-15. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
2
Improving Gram stain proficiency in hospital and satellite laboratories that do not have microbiology.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):458-461. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0556.
4
Positive blood cultures: can we always trust the Gram stain?
Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Nov;126(5):671-2. doi: 10.1309/A3A7-34C9-1JHP-HWB6.
5
Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Nov;126(5):686-90. doi: 10.1309/V4KE2FPM5T8V4552.
6
Quantitative gram stain interpretation criteria used by microbiology laboratories in Alberta, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4266-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.11.4266-4268.2000.
9
Waltzing around Sacred Cows on the Way to the Future.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01779-17. Print 2018 Mar.
10
Performances of automated digital imaging of Gram-stained slides with on-screen reading against manual microscopy.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;40(10):2171-2176. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04233-2. Epub 2021 May 8.

引用本文的文献

2
A novel framework for the automated characterization of Gram-stained blood culture slides using a large-scale vision transformer.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Mar 12;63(3):e0151424. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01514-24. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Determining causal pathogens and inflammatory state of mastitis in dairy cows via Gram staining of precipitates in milk.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jan 13;11:1492564. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1492564. eCollection 2024.
4
Virtual Gram staining of label-free bacteria using dark-field microscopy and deep learning.
Sci Adv. 2025 Jan 10;11(2):eads2757. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads2757. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
5
Wash-Free Bacterial Gram-Typing and Photodynamic Inactivation with Long-Chain-Tailed BODIPY Derivatives.
Biomater Res. 2024 Sep 3;28:0069. doi: 10.34133/bmr.0069. eCollection 2024.
7
Performance evaluation of machine-assisted interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0087623. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00876-23. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
Diagnostic Utility of Gram Stain for Oral Smears - A Review.
J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2023 Mar 22;11(3):130-134. doi: 10.4103/jmau.jmau_108_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Jul;52(7):951-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0142.
2
The role of the clinical laboratory in the future of health care: lean microbiology.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jun;52(6):1812-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00099-14. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing.
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 May 15;432:44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.033. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
4
A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.
J Patient Saf. 2013 Sep;9(3):122-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid gram stain in children with suspected bacterial meningitis.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Feb;31(2):195-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31823d7b6f.
6
Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
Adv Anat Pathol. 2011 Sep;18(5):406-13. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e318229bf20.
8
9
Amended reports: development and validation of a taxonomy of defects.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Aug;130(2):238-46. doi: 10.1309/9UPELFVQU5WLCUHX.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验