Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark; Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mol Oncol. 2016 Jun;10(6):879-94. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
The DNA damage checkpoints provide an anti-cancer barrier in diverse tumour types, however this concept has remained unexplored in prostate cancer (CaP). Furthermore, targeting DNA repair defects by PARP1 inhibitors (PARPi) as a cancer treatment strategy is emerging yet requires suitable predictive biomarkers. To address these issues, we performed immunohistochemical analysis of multiple markers of DNA damage signalling, oxidative stress, DNA repair and cell cycle control pathways during progression of human prostate disease from benign hyperplasia, through intraepithelial neoplasia to CaP, complemented by genetic analyses of TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement and NQO1, an anti-oxidant factor and p53 protector. The DNA damage checkpoint barrier (γH2AX, pATM, p53) mechanism was activated during CaP tumorigenesis, albeit less and with delayed culmination compared to other cancers, possibly reflecting lower replication stress (slow proliferation despite cases of Rb loss and cyclin D1 overexpression) and progressive loss of ATM activator NKX3.1. Oxidative stress (8-oxoguanine lesions) and NQO1 increased during disease progression. NQO1 genotypes of 390 men did not indicate predisposition to CaP, yet loss of NQO1 in CaP suggested potential progression-opposing tumour suppressor role. TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement and PTEN loss, events sensitizing to PARPi, occurred frequently along with heterogeneous loss of DNA repair factors 53BP1, JMJD1C and Rev7 (all studied here for the first time in CaP) whose defects may cause resistance to PARPi. Overall, our results reveal an unorthodox DNA damage checkpoint barrier scenario in CaP tumorigenesis, and provide novel insights into oxidative stress and DNA repair, with implications for biomarker guidance of future targeted therapy of CaP.
DNA 损伤检查点为多种肿瘤类型提供了抗癌屏障,但这一概念在前列腺癌 (CaP) 中尚未得到探索。此外,通过 PARP1 抑制剂 (PARPi) 靶向 DNA 修复缺陷作为癌症治疗策略正在出现,但需要合适的预测生物标志物。为了解决这些问题,我们对人类前列腺疾病从良性增生、上皮内瘤变到 CaP 的进展过程中多种 DNA 损伤信号、氧化应激、DNA 修复和细胞周期控制途径的多个标志物进行了免疫组织化学分析,并辅以 TMPRSS2-ERG 重排和 NQO1(抗氧化因子和 p53 保护因子)的遗传分析。尽管与其他癌症相比,CaP 肿瘤发生过程中的 DNA 损伤检查点屏障(γH2AX、pATM、p53)机制的激活程度较低且延迟,但仍被激活,这可能反映出较低的复制应激(尽管存在 Rb 缺失和 cyclin D1 过表达的情况,但增殖缓慢)和 ATM 激活剂 NKX3.1 的逐渐丧失。氧化应激(8-氧鸟嘌呤损伤)和 NQO1 在疾病进展过程中增加。390 名男性的 NQO1 基因型并未表明易患 CaP,但在 CaP 中 NQO1 的缺失表明其具有潜在的促进肿瘤进展的肿瘤抑制作用。TMPRSS2-ERG 重排和 PTEN 缺失使 PARPi 敏感,这些事件与 53BP1、JMJD1C 和 Rev7(所有这些都在 CaP 中首次进行了研究)等 DNA 修复因子的异质性缺失同时发生,这些缺陷可能导致对 PARPi 的耐药性。总的来说,我们的研究结果揭示了 CaP 肿瘤发生中一种非传统的 DNA 损伤检查点屏障情景,并为氧化应激和 DNA 修复提供了新的见解,为未来 CaP 的靶向治疗的生物标志物指导提供了依据。