Petti S, Messano G A
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
J Hosp Infect. 2016 May;93(1):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Traditional cleaning and disinfection methods are inefficient for complete decontamination of hospital surfaces from meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Additional methods, such as nano-TiO2-based photocatalytic disinfection (PCD), could be helpful.
To evaluate anti-MRSA activity of PCD on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) surfaces in natural-like conditions.
Two identical PVC surfaces were used, and nano-TiO2 was incorporated into one of them. The surfaces were contaminated with MRSA isolated from hospitalized patients using a mist sprayer to simulate the mode of environmental contamination caused by a carrier. MRSA cell density was assessed before contamination until 180min after contamination using Rodac plates. The differences between test and control surfaces in terms of MRSA density and log MRSA density reduction were assessed using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. Five strains were tested, and each strain was tested five times.
The highest median MRSA densities [46.3 and 43.1 colony-forming units (cfu)/cm(2) for control and test surfaces, respectively] were detected 45min after contamination. Median MRSA densities 180min after contamination were 10.1 and 0.7cfu/cm(2) for control and test surfaces, respectively (P<0.01). Log MRSA density reduction attributable to PCD was 1.16logcfu/cm(2), corresponding to 93% reduction of the baseline MRSA contamination.
The disinfectant activity remained stable throughout the 25 testing occasions, despite between-test cleaning and disinfection. The anti-MRSA activity of PCD was compatible with the benchmark for surface hygiene in hospitals (<1cfu/cm(2)), but required 3h of exposure to photocatalysis. Thus, PCD could be considered for non-clinical surfaces. However, for clinical surfaces, PCD should be regarded as supplemental to conventional decontamination procedures, rather than an alternative.
传统的清洁和消毒方法在彻底清除医院表面耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)方面效率低下。诸如基于纳米二氧化钛的光催化消毒(PCD)等其他方法可能会有所帮助。
评估在类似自然条件下PCD对聚氯乙烯(PVC)表面的抗MRSA活性。
使用两个相同的PVC表面,其中一个掺入纳米二氧化钛。使用喷雾器将从住院患者中分离出的MRSA污染这些表面,以模拟携带者造成的环境污染模式。使用Rodac平板在污染前至污染后180分钟评估MRSA细胞密度。使用参数和非参数统计测试评估测试表面和对照表面在MRSA密度和MRSA密度对数降低方面的差异。测试了五株菌株,每株菌株测试五次。
污染后45分钟检测到最高的MRSA密度中位数[对照表面和测试表面分别为46.3和43.1菌落形成单位(cfu)/cm²]。污染后180分钟,对照表面和测试表面的MRSA密度中位数分别为10.1和0.7cfu/cm²(P<0.01)。PCD导致的MRSA密度对数降低为1.16logcfu/cm²,相当于基线MRSA污染减少93%。
尽管在测试之间进行了清洁和消毒,但在整个25次测试过程中消毒活性保持稳定。PCD的抗MRSA活性符合医院表面卫生基准(<1cfu/cm²),但需要3小时的光催化暴露时间。因此,PCD可考虑用于非临床表面。然而,对于临床表面,PCD应被视为传统去污程序的补充,而非替代方法。