Ramisetty N, Kwon Y, Mohtadi N
1. Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
2. Health Sciences Centre, 3330 Hospital Dr, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Feb 6;2(1):15-27. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv002. eCollection 2015 Jan.
Hip preservation surgery is rapidly advancing and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are becoming an integral part of measuring treatment effectiveness. Traditionally the modified Harris hip score has been used as the main outcome measure. More recently, new PRO tools in the field have been developed. We performed a systematic review of the English literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and SPORTDiscus databases to identify the PRO tools used in hip preservation surgery. Our aim was to critically appraise the quality of the questionnaire properties in order to recommend the most appropriate PRO tool for future use. Measurement properties of each PRO questionnaire were rated from excellent to poor, based on Terwee criteria and the results from the included studies. Six PRO tools were identified with description or comparison of their measurement properties in 10 articles. While, most recently developed PRO tools, the hip outcome score (HOS), the Copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS) and the international hip outcome tool (iHOT-33) scored better than the others in their measurement properties, iHOT-33 scored the best of all the PRO tools and is recommended for future use in hip preservation surgery.
髋关节保留手术正在迅速发展,患者报告结局(PRO)指标正成为衡量治疗效果不可或缺的一部分。传统上,改良Harris髋关节评分一直被用作主要结局指标。最近,该领域开发了新的PRO工具。我们对来自MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和SPORTDiscus数据库的英文文献进行了系统综述,以确定髋关节保留手术中使用的PRO工具。我们的目的是严格评估问卷属性的质量,以便推荐未来使用的最合适的PRO工具。根据Terwee标准和纳入研究的结果,对每个PRO问卷的测量属性从优秀到差进行评分。在10篇文章中确定了6种PRO工具,并对其测量属性进行了描述或比较。虽然最近开发的PRO工具,髋关节结局评分(HOS)、哥本哈根髋关节和腹股沟结局评分(HAGOS)以及国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-33)在测量属性方面得分优于其他工具,但iHOT-33在所有PRO工具中得分最高,建议在未来的髋关节保留手术中使用。