Suppr超能文献

用于囊性纤维化的重组人脱氧核糖核酸酶

Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis.

作者信息

Yang Connie, Chilvers Mark, Montgomery Mark, Nolan Sarah J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6H 3V4.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4:CD001127. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001127.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dornase alfa is currently used as a mucolytic to treat pulmonary disease (the major cause of morbidity and mortality) in cystic fibrosis. It reduces mucus viscosity in the lungs, promoting improved clearance of secretions. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the use of dornase alfa in cystic fibrosis is associated with improved mortality and morbidity compared to placebo or other medications that improve airway clearance, and to identify any adverse events associated with its use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and abstracts from conferences. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Register: 30 November 2015.Clinicaltrials.gov was also searched to identify unpublished or ongoing trials. Date of most recent search: 28 November 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing dornase alfa to placebo, standard therapy or other medications that improve airway clearance.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors independently assessed trials against the inclusion criteria; two authors carried out analysis of methodological quality and data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 54 trials, of which 19 (including a total of 2565 participants) met our inclusion criteria. Three additional papers examined the healthcare cost from one of the clinical trials. Fifteen trials compared dornase alfa to placebo or no dornase alfa treatment (2447 participants); two compared daily dornase to hypertonic saline (32 participants); one compared daily dornase alfa with hypertonic saline and alternate day dornase alfa (48 participants); one compared dornase alfa to mannitol and the combination of both drugs (38 participants). Trial duration varied from six days to three years.Compared to placebo, forced expiratory volume at one second improved in the intervention groups, with significant differences at one, three, six months and two years. There was also a significant improvement in lung clearance index at one month. There was a decrease in pulmonary exacerbations compared to placebo in trials of longer duration. The quality of the evidence from placebo-controlled trials was moderate to high for outcomes of lung function and pulmonary exacerbations. Limited, low quality evidence was available for changes in quality of life from baseline. One trial that examined the cost of care, including the cost of dornase alfa, found that the cost savings from dornase alfa offset 18% to 38% of the medication costs.The results for trials comparing dornase alfa to other medications that improve airway clearance (hypertonic saline or mannitol) were mixed, with one trial showing a greater improvement in forced expiratory volume at one second for dornase alfa compared to hypertonic saline, and three trials finding no difference between medications. In the only trial to assess the combination of dornase alfa with another medication compared to dornase alone, there was no benefit seen with the combination of dornase alfa and mannitol. Evidence of dornase alfa compared to other medications was limited and the open-label design of the trials may have induced bias, therefore the quality of the evidence was judged to be low.Dornase alfa did not cause significantly more adverse effects, except voice alteration and rash.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to show that, compared with placebo, therapy with dornase alfa improves lung function in people with cystic fibrosis in trials lasting one month to two years. There was a decrease in pulmonary exacerbations in trials of six months or longer. Voice alteration and rash appear to be the only adverse events reported with increased frequency in randomised controlled trials. There is not enough evidence to firmly conclude if dornase alfa is superior to hyperosmolar agents in improving lung function.

摘要

背景

Dornase alfa目前用作黏液溶解剂,用于治疗囊性纤维化患者的肺部疾病(发病和死亡的主要原因)。它可降低肺部黏液的黏稠度,促进分泌物的清除。这是对之前发表的一篇综述的更新。

目的

确定与安慰剂或其他改善气道清除的药物相比,在囊性纤维化患者中使用Dornase alfa是否能改善死亡率和发病率,并确定其使用相关的任何不良事件。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传疾病小组试验注册库,其中包括通过全面电子数据库检索、手工检索相关期刊以及会议摘要识别出的参考文献。该小组囊性纤维化注册库的最新检索日期为2015年11月30日。我们还检索了Clinicaltrials.gov以识别未发表或正在进行的试验。最新检索日期为2015年11月28日。

入选标准

所有比较Dornase alfa与安慰剂、标准治疗或其他改善气道清除的药物的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

作者根据纳入标准独立评估试验;两位作者进行方法学质量分析和数据提取。

主要结果

检索共识别出54项试验,其中19项(共2565名参与者)符合我们的纳入标准。另外三篇论文研究了其中一项临床试验的医疗费用。15项试验比较了Dornase alfa与安慰剂或不使用Dornase alfa治疗(2447名参与者);两项试验比较了每日使用Dornase与高渗盐水(32名参与者);一项试验比较了每日使用Dornase alfa与高渗盐水以及隔日使用Dornase alfa(48名参与者);一项试验比较了Dornase alfa与甘露醇以及两种药物的联合使用(38名参与者)。试验持续时间从6天到3年不等。与安慰剂相比,干预组一秒用力呼气量有所改善,在1个月、3个月、6个月和2年时存在显著差异。1个月时肺清除指数也有显著改善。在持续时间较长的试验中,与安慰剂相比,肺部恶化情况有所减少。对于肺功能和肺部恶化结果,安慰剂对照试验的证据质量为中等至高。关于生活质量自基线的变化,仅有有限的低质量证据。一项研究护理成本(包括Dornase alfa成本)的试验发现,Dornase alfa节省的成本抵消了药物成本的18%至38%。比较Dornase alfa与其他改善气道清除的药物(高渗盐水或甘露醇)的试验结果不一,一项试验显示Dornase alfa的一秒用力呼气量改善程度大于高渗盐水,三项试验发现药物之间无差异。在唯一一项评估Dornase alfa与另一种药物联合使用与单独使用Dornase alfa相比的试验中,Dornase alfa与甘露醇联合使用未显示出益处。与其他药物相比,Dornase alfa的证据有限,且试验的开放标签设计可能导致偏倚,因此证据质量被判定为低。除了声音改变和皮疹外,Dornase alfa并未导致显著更多的不良反应。

作者结论

有证据表明,在为期1个月至2年的试验中,与安慰剂相比,Dornase alfa治疗可改善囊性纤维化患者的肺功能。在为期6个月或更长时间的试验中,肺部恶化情况有所减少。声音改变和皮疹似乎是随机对照试验中报告频率增加的仅有的不良事件。没有足够的证据能确凿地得出Dornase alfa在改善肺功能方面优于高渗药物的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验