Suppr超能文献

抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析

Antibiotics Versus Appendicectomy for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Rollins Katie E, Varadhan Krishna K, Neal Keith R, Lobo Dileep N

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, E Floor, West Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham University Hospitals, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2305-18. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3561-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated acute appendicitis has been managed traditionally by early appendicectomy. However, recently, there has been increasing interest in the potential for primary treatment with antibiotics, with studies finding this to be associated with fewer complications than appendicectomy. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

METHOD

This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials included adult patients presenting with uncomplicated acute appendicitis treated with antibiotics or appendicectomy. The primary outcome measure was complications. Secondary outcomes included treatment efficacy, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rate and incidence of complicated appendicitis.

RESULTS

Five randomised controlled trials with a total of 1430 participants (727 undergoing antibiotic therapy and 703 undergoing appendicectomy) were included. There was a 39 % risk reduction in overall complication rates in those treated with antibiotics compared with those undergoing appendicectomy (RR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.44-0.83, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in hospital LOS (mean difference 0.25 days, 95 % CI -0.05 to 0.56, p = 0.10). In the antibiotic cohort, 123 of 587 patients initially treated successfully with antibiotics were readmitted with symptoms suspicious of recurrent appendicitis. The incidence of complicated appendicitis was not increased in patients who underwent appendicectomy after "failed" antibiotic treatment (10.8 %) versus those who underwent primary appendicectomy (17.9 %).

CONCLUSION

Increasing evidence supports the primary treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis with antibiotics, in terms of complications, hospital LOS and risk of complicated appendicitis. Antibiotics should be prescribed once a diagnosis of acute appendicitis is made or considered.

摘要

背景

传统上,单纯性急性阑尾炎的治疗方法是早期阑尾切除术。然而,最近人们对使用抗生素进行初始治疗的可能性越来越感兴趣,研究发现这与比阑尾切除术更少的并发症相关。本研究的目的是比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的疗效。

方法

这项对随机对照试验的荟萃分析纳入了患有单纯性急性阑尾炎并接受抗生素治疗或阑尾切除术的成年患者。主要结局指标是并发症。次要结局包括治疗效果、住院时间、再入院率和复杂性阑尾炎的发生率。

结果

纳入了五项随机对照试验,共有1430名参与者(727名接受抗生素治疗,703名接受阑尾切除术)。与接受阑尾切除术的患者相比,接受抗生素治疗的患者总体并发症发生率降低了39%(风险比0.61,95%置信区间0.44 - 0.83,p = 0.002)。住院时间无显著差异(平均差异0.25天,95%置信区间 - 0.05至0.56,p = 0.10)。在抗生素治疗组中,587名最初接受抗生素治疗成功的患者中有123名因怀疑复发性阑尾炎症状而再次入院。“抗生素治疗失败”后接受阑尾切除术的患者与接受初次阑尾切除术的患者相比,复杂性阑尾炎的发生率没有增加(分别为10.8%和17.9%)。

结论

越来越多的证据支持在并发症、住院时间和复杂性阑尾炎风险方面,使用抗生素对急性单纯性阑尾炎进行初始治疗。一旦确诊或疑似急性阑尾炎,就应开具抗生素处方。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验