Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位作为老年衰弱与死亡率之间的调节因素。

Socioeconomic status as a moderator between frailty and mortality at old ages.

作者信息

Gu Danan, Yang Fang, Sautter Jessica

机构信息

United Nations Population Division, Two UN Plaza, DC2-1910, New York, NY, 20012, USA.

Department of Social Work, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2016 Aug 9;16:151. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0322-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the well-established power of frailty to predict mortality, and the known associations of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality, it is largely unknown whether the linkage between frailty and mortality varies across different SES groups. This study aims to investigate whether SES moderates the association between frailty and mortality.

METHODS

We relied on the 2008/2009 and 2011/2012 waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, a nationwide sample of 13,731 adults aged 65 or older in China. Frailty was constructed using a cumulative index of 38 items (with 39 deficits) reflecting different dimensions of health; the index or the proportion of deficits ranges from 0 to 1, with greater scores indicating poorer health condition. SES was measured by a socioeconomic vulnerability index (SEVI) also from a similar cumulative approach consisting of 6 deficits; the proportion of deficits ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating lower SES. Eight Weibull hazard regression models were performed to examine how SES moderates the linkage between frailty and mortality.

RESULTS

We found that a one percentage point increase in the frailty index was associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) by 2.7 % (HR = 1.027, 95 % CI: 1.025-1.027); a one percentage point increase in SEVI score was associated with an increased hazard ratio by 0.6 % (HR = 1.006, 95 % CI: 1.004-1.008) controlling for demographics. When interactions between SEVI and frailty index were modeled, the increased mortality risk associated with frailty was weaker among people with lower SES than among people with higher SES (HR = 0.983, 95 % CI: 0.967-0.992). However, the moderating role of SES was diminished when interactions between SES and age and between frailty and age were modeled. With increasing age, the increased mortality risks associated with frailty and socioeconomic vulnerability weakened.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was a stronger predictor of mortality among individuals with higher SES than those with lower SES. The increased mortality risks associated with socioeconomic vulnerability and frailty weakened with age. Public health programs aimed at improving SES and promoting healthy longevity should start early in old age, or even earlier, and target poor and frail older adults for maximum impact.

摘要

背景

尽管衰弱预测死亡率的作用已得到充分证实,且社会经济地位(SES)与死亡率之间的关联也为人所知,但衰弱与死亡率之间的联系在不同SES群体中是否存在差异,在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查SES是否会调节衰弱与死亡率之间的关联。

方法

我们依据中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查2008/2009年和2011/2012年两轮的数据,该调查是对中国13731名65岁及以上成年人的全国性抽样。衰弱是通过一个包含38个项目(39项缺陷)的累积指数构建的,这些项目反映了健康的不同维度;该指数或缺陷比例范围从0到1,分数越高表明健康状况越差。SES通过社会经济脆弱性指数(SEVI)来衡量,该指数同样采用类似的累积方法,由6项缺陷组成;缺陷比例范围从0到1,分数越高表明SES越低。我们进行了八个威布尔风险回归模型,以检验SES如何调节衰弱与死亡率之间的联系。

结果

我们发现,衰弱指数每增加一个百分点,风险比(HR)增加2.7%(HR = 1.027,95%置信区间:1.025 - 1.027);在控制人口统计学因素后,SEVI分数每增加一个百分点,风险比增加0.6%(HR = 1.006,95%置信区间:1.004 - 1.008)。当对SEVI与衰弱指数之间的相互作用进行建模时,与衰弱相关的死亡率增加风险在SES较低的人群中比在SES较高的人群中更弱(HR = 0.983,95%置信区间:0.967 - 0.992)。然而,当对SES与年龄之间以及衰弱与年龄之间的相互作用进行建模时,SES的调节作用减弱。随着年龄的增长,与衰弱和社会经济脆弱性相关的死亡率增加风险减弱。

结论

在SES较高的个体中,衰弱是比SES较低个体更强的死亡率预测因素。与社会经济脆弱性和衰弱相关的死亡率增加风险随着年龄增长而减弱。旨在改善SES和促进健康长寿的公共卫生项目应在老年期甚至更早开始,并针对贫困和衰弱的老年人,以实现最大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5283/4979157/2a18da730c6b/12877_2016_322_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验