Langa Kenneth M, Larson Eric B, Crimmins Eileen M, Faul Jessica D, Levine Deborah A, Kabeto Mohammed U, Weir David R
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor2Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan3Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor4Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Group Health Research Institute, Departments of Medicine and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):51-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6807.
The aging of the US population is expected to lead to a large increase in the number of adults with dementia, but some recent studies in the United States and other high-income countries suggest that the age-specific risk of dementia may have declined over the past 25 years. Clarifying current and future population trends in dementia prevalence and risk has important implications for patients, families, and government programs.
To compare the prevalence of dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative, population-based longitudinal survey of individuals in the United States 65 years or older from the 2000 (n = 10 546) and 2012 (n = 10 511) waves of the HRS.
Dementia was identified in each year using HRS cognitive measures and validated methods for classifying self-respondents, as well as those represented by a proxy. Logistic regression was used to identify socioeconomic and health variables associated with change in dementia prevalence between 2000 and 2012.
The study cohorts had an average age of 75.0 years (95% CI, 74.8-75.2 years) in 2000 and 74.8 years (95% CI, 74.5-75.1 years) in 2012 (P = .24); 58.4% (95% CI, 57.3%-59.4%) of the 2000 cohort was female compared with 56.3% (95% CI, 55.5%-57.0%) of the 2012 cohort (P < .001). Dementia prevalence among those 65 years or older decreased from 11.6% (95% CI, 10.7%-12.7%) in 2000 to 8.8% (95% CI, 8.2%-9.4%) (8.6% with age- and sex-standardization) in 2012 (P < .001). More years of education was associated with a lower risk for dementia, and average years of education increased significantly (from 11.8 years [95% CI, 11.6-11.9 years] to 12.7 years [95% CI, 12.6-12.9 years]; P < .001) between 2000 and 2012. The decline in dementia prevalence occurred even though there was a significant age- and sex-adjusted increase between years in the cardiovascular risk profile (eg, prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) among older US adults.
The prevalence of dementia in the United States declined significantly between 2000 and 2012. An increase in educational attainment was associated with some of the decline in dementia prevalence, but the full set of social, behavioral, and medical factors contributing to the decline is still uncertain. Continued monitoring of trends in dementia incidence and prevalence will be important for better gauging the full future societal impact of dementia as the number of older adults increases in the decades ahead.
预计美国人口老龄化将导致痴呆症成年患者数量大幅增加,但美国和其他高收入国家最近的一些研究表明,过去25年中特定年龄段的痴呆症风险可能有所下降。明确痴呆症患病率和风险的当前及未来人口趋势对患者、家庭和政府项目具有重要意义。
比较2000年和2012年美国痴呆症的患病率。
设计、背景和参与者:我们使用了健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据,这是一项对美国65岁及以上人群具有全国代表性的基于人群的纵向调查,数据来自HRS 2000年(n = 10546)和2012年(n = 10511)的调查波次。
每年使用HRS认知测量方法以及用于对自我受访者和代理人代表的受访者进行分类的验证方法来识别痴呆症。使用逻辑回归来确定与2000年至2012年痴呆症患病率变化相关的社会经济和健康变量。
研究队列在2000年的平均年龄为75.0岁(95%置信区间,74.8 - 75.2岁),在2012年为74.8岁(95%置信区间,74.5 - 75.1岁)(P = 0.24);2000年队列中58.4%(95%置信区间,57.3% - 59.4%)为女性,而2012年队列中这一比例为56.3%(95%置信区间,55.5% - 57.0%)(P < 0.001)。65岁及以上人群中的痴呆症患病率从2000年的11.6%(95%置信区间,10.7% - 12.7%)降至2012年的8.8%(95%置信区间,8.2% - 9.4%)(年龄和性别标准化后为8.6%)(P < 0.001)。受教育年限增加与痴呆症风险降低相关,且2000年至2012年间平均受教育年限显著增加(从11.8年[95%置信区间,11.6 - 11.9年]增至12.7年[95%置信区间,12.6 - 12.9年];P < 0.001)。尽管美国老年成年人的心血管风险状况(如高血压、糖尿病和肥胖症的患病率)在各年份之间经年龄和性别调整后有显著增加,但痴呆症患病率仍有所下降。
2000年至2012年期间,美国痴呆症患病率显著下降。受教育程度提高与痴呆症患病率下降部分相关,但导致这种下降的全部社会、行为和医学因素仍不确定。随着未来几十年老年成年人数量增加,持续监测痴呆症发病率和患病率趋势对于更好地评估痴呆症对未来社会的全面影响将至关重要。