Wiffen Philip J, Knaggs Roger, Derry Sheena, Cole Peter, Phillips Tudor, Moore R Andrew
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2RD.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD012227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012227.pub2.
Paracetamol, either alone or in combination with codeine or dihydrocodeine, is commonly used to treat chronic neuropathic pain. This review sought evidence for efficacy and harm from randomised double-blind studies.
To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse events of paracetamol with or without codeine or dihydrocodeine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to July 2016, together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews, and two online study registries.
We included randomised, double-blind studies of two weeks' duration or longer, comparing paracetamol, alone or in combination with codeine or dihydrocodeine, with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain.
Two review authors independently searched for studies, extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality and potential bias. We did not carry out any pooled analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.
No study satisfied the inclusion criteria. Effects of interventions were not assessed as there were no included studies. We have only very low quality evidence and have no reliable indication of the likely effect.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the suggestion that paracetamol alone, or in combination with codeine or dihydrocodeine, works in any neuropathic pain condition.
对乙酰氨基酚单独使用或与可待因或双氢可待因联合使用,常用于治疗慢性神经性疼痛。本综述旨在从随机双盲研究中寻找疗效和危害的证据。
评估对乙酰氨基酚单独使用或与可待因或双氢可待因联合使用治疗成人慢性神经性疼痛的镇痛效果及不良事件。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE和Embase,检索时间从建库至2016年7月,同时检索了检索到的论文和综述的参考文献列表,以及两个在线研究注册库。
我们纳入了为期两周或更长时间的随机双盲研究,比较对乙酰氨基酚单独使用或与可待因或双氢可待因联合使用与安慰剂或其他积极治疗方法在慢性神经性疼痛中的效果。
两位综述作者独立检索研究、提取疗效和不良事件数据,并检查研究质量和潜在偏倚问题。我们未进行任何汇总分析。我们使用GRADE评估证据质量。
没有研究符合纳入标准。由于没有纳入研究,因此未评估干预措施的效果。我们只有极低质量的证据,没有可靠的迹象表明可能的效果。
没有足够的证据支持或反驳对乙酰氨基酚单独使用或与可待因或双氢可待因联合使用对任何神经性疼痛状况有效的建议。