Gotthardt Juliet D, Bello Nicholas T
Department of Animal Sciences, School of Environmental & Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Nutritional Sciences Graduate Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Bunswick, NJ, USA.
Department of Animal Sciences, School of Environmental & Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Nutritional Sciences Graduate Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Bunswick, NJ, USA; New Jersey Institute for Food, Nutrition, and Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2017 May 15;174:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.046. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
Alternate day, intermittent fasting (IMF) can be an effective weight loss strategy. However, the effects of IMF on eating behaviors are not well characterized. We investigated the acute and residual effects of IMF for weight loss on meal patterns in adult obese male C57BL/6 mice. After 8weeks of ad libitum high-fat diet to induce diet-induced obesity (DIO), mice were either continued on ad libitum high-fat diet (HFD) or placed on one of 5 diet strategies for weight loss: IMF of high-fat diet (IMF-HFD), pair-fed to IMF-HFD group (PF-HFD), ad libitum low-fat diet (LFD), IMF of low-fat diet (IMF-LFD), or pair-fed to IMF-LFD group (PF-LFD). After the 4-week diet period, all groups were refed the high-fat diet for 6weeks. By the end of the diet period, all 5 groups had lost weight compared with HFD group, but after 6weeks of HFD re-feeding all groups had similar body weights. On (Day 2) of the diet period, IMF-HFD had greater first meal size and faster eating rate compared with HFD. Also, first meal duration was greater in LFD and IMF-LFD compared with HFD. At the end of the diet period (Day 28), the intermittent fasting groups (IMF-HFD and IMF-LFD) had greater first meal sizes and faster first meal eating rate compared with their respective ad libitum fed groups on similar diets (HFD and LFD). Also, average meal duration was longer on Day 28 in the low-fat diet groups (LFD and IMF-LFD) compared with high-fat diet groups (HFD and IMF-HFD). After 6weeks of HFD re-feeding (Day 70), there were no differences in meal patterns in groups that had previously experienced intermittent fasting compared with ad libitum fed groups. These findings suggest that meal patterns are only transiently altered during alternate day intermittent fasting for weight loss in obese male mice.
隔日间歇性禁食(IMF)可能是一种有效的减肥策略。然而,IMF对饮食行为的影响尚未得到充分描述。我们研究了IMF对成年肥胖雄性C57BL/6小鼠体重减轻的急性和残留影响,以及对其进食模式的影响。在给予8周的高脂自由采食饮食以诱导饮食诱导性肥胖(DIO)后,小鼠要么继续高脂自由采食饮食(HFD),要么采用以下5种减肥饮食策略之一:高脂饮食的IMF(IMF-HFD)、与IMF-HFD组配对喂食(PF-HFD)、低脂自由采食饮食(LFD)、低脂饮食的IMF(IMF-LFD)或与IMF-LFD组配对喂食(PF-LFD)。在为期4周的饮食期结束后,所有组均重新给予高脂饮食6周。到饮食期结束时,与HFD组相比,所有5个组的体重均有所减轻,但在重新给予高脂饮食6周后,所有组的体重相似。在饮食期的第2天,IMF-HFD组的第一餐食量比HFD组更大,进食速度更快。此外,与HFD组相比,LFD组和IMF-LFD组的第一餐持续时间更长。在饮食期结束时(第28天),与各自采用类似饮食自由采食的组(HFD和LFD)相比,间歇性禁食组(IMF-HFD和IMF-LFD)的第一餐食量更大,第一餐进食速度更快。此外,与高脂饮食组(HFD和IMF-HFD)相比,低脂饮食组(LFD和IMF-LFD)在第28天的平均餐食持续时间更长。在重新给予高脂饮食6周后(第70天),与自由采食组相比,之前经历过间歇性禁食的组在进食模式上没有差异。这些发现表明,在肥胖雄性小鼠中,隔日间歇性禁食减肥期间,进食模式只是暂时改变。