Nishijima Tomohiro F, Shachar Shlomit S, Nyrop Kirsten A, Muss Hyman B
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Oncologist. 2017 Apr;22(4):470-479. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0419. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
Compared with chemotherapy, significant improvement in survival outcomes with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab and the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor atezolizumab has been shown in several types of advanced solid tumors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare safety and tolerability between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.
PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were searched 1966 to September 2016. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single-agent U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) with chemotherapy in cancer patients reporting any all-grade (1-4) or high-grade (3-4) adverse events (AEs), all- or high-grade treatment-related symptoms, hematologic toxicities and immune-related AEs, treatment discontinuation due to toxicities, or treatment-related deaths. The summary incidence, relative risk, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
A total of 3,450 patients from 7 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis: 4 nivolumab, 2 pembrolizumab, and 1 atezolizumab trials. The underlying malignancies included were non-small cell lung cancer (4 trials) and melanoma (3 trials). Compared with chemotherapy, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a significantly lower risk of all- and high-grade fatigue, sensory neuropathy, diarrhea and hematologic toxicities, all-grade anorexia, nausea, and constipation, any all- and high-grade AEs, and treatment discontinuation. There was an increased risk of all-grade rash, pruritus, colitis, aminotransferase elevations, hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism, and all- and high-grade pneumonitis with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. Our results provide further evidence supporting the favorable risk/benefit ratio for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. 2017;22:470-479 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare summary toxicity endpoints and clinically relevant adverse events between programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy. PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of treatment-related symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and sensory neuropathy) but a higher risk of immune-related adverse events (AEs). Summary toxicity endpoints favor PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors (any all- and high-grade AEs and treatment discontinuation). PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. In addition to efficacy data from trials, our findings provide useful information for clinicians for well-balanced discussions with their patients on the risks and benefits of treatment options for advanced cancer.
与化疗相比,程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂纳武单抗和派姆单抗以及程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂阿特珠单抗已在多种类型的晚期实体瘤中显示出生存结局的显著改善。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与化疗之间的安全性和耐受性。
检索了1966年至2016年9月的PubMed和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)数据库。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了美国食品药品监督管理局批准的单药PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(纳武单抗、派姆单抗或阿特珠单抗)与化疗在报告任何全等级(1-4级)或高级别(3-4级)不良事件(AE)、所有或高级别治疗相关症状、血液学毒性和免疫相关AE、因毒性导致的治疗中断或治疗相关死亡的癌症患者中的情况。计算了汇总发生率、相对风险和95%置信区间。
荟萃分析共纳入了来自7项RCT的3450例患者:4项纳武单抗试验、2项派姆单抗试验和1项阿特珠单抗试验。所涉及的潜在恶性肿瘤包括非小细胞肺癌(4项试验)和黑色素瘤(3项试验)。与化疗相比,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在全等级和高级别疲劳、感觉神经病变、腹泻和血液学毒性、全等级厌食、恶心和便秘、任何全等级和高级别AE以及治疗中断方面的风险显著更低。使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂会增加全等级皮疹、瘙痒、结肠炎、转氨酶升高、甲状腺功能减退和甲状腺功能亢进以及全等级和高级别肺炎的风险。
PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂总体上比化疗耐受性更好。我们的结果提供了进一步的证据支持PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂良好的风险/获益比。2017年;22:470-479对实践的启示:我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂与化疗之间的汇总毒性终点和临床相关不良事件。PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与治疗相关症状(疲劳、厌食、恶心、腹泻、便秘和感觉神经病变)的风险较低,但与免疫相关不良事件(AE)的风险较高。汇总毒性终点有利于PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(任何全等级和高级别AE以及治疗中断)。PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂总体上比化疗耐受性更好。除了试验的疗效数据外,我们的研究结果为临床医生与患者就晚期癌症治疗选择的风险和获益进行全面讨论提供了有用信息。