Ruiz P, Sack A, Wampole M, Bobst S, Vracko M
Computational Toxicology and Methods Development Laboratory, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Computational Toxicology and Methods Development Laboratory, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chemosphere. 2017 Jul;178:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Thousands of potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals present difficult regulatory challenges. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals can interfere with several nuclear hormone receptors associated with a variety of adverse health effects. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has released its reviews of Tier 1 screening assay results for a set of pesticides in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP), and recently, the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP) data. In this study, the predictive ability of QSAR and docking approaches is evaluated using these data sets. This study also presents a computational systems biology approach using carbaryl (1-naphthyl methylcarbamate) as a case study. For estrogen receptor and androgen receptor binding predictions, two commercial and two open source QSAR tools were used, as was the publicly available docking tool Endocrine Disruptome. For estrogen receptor binding predictions, the ADMET Predictor, VEGA, and OCHEM models (specificity: 0.88, 0.88, and 0.86, and accuracy: 0.81, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively) were each more reliable than the MetaDrug™ model (specificity 0.81 and accuracy 0.77). For androgen receptor binding predictions, the Endocrine Disruptome and ADMET Predictor models (specificity: 0.94 and 0.8, and accuracy: 0.78 and 0.71, respectively) were more reliable than the MetaDrug™ model (specificity 0.33 and accuracy 0.4). A consensus approach is proposed that reaches general agreement among the models (specificity 0.94 and accuracy 0.89). This study integrates QSAR, docking, and systems biology approaches as a virtual screening tool for use in risk assessment. As such, this systems biology pathways and network analysis approach provides a means to more critically assess the potential effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
数千种潜在的内分泌干扰化学物质带来了艰巨的监管挑战。内分泌干扰化学物质可干扰多种与各种不良健康影响相关的核激素受体。美国环境保护局(U.S. EPA)已发布其对内分泌干扰物筛选计划(EDSP)中一组农药以及近期协作雌激素受体活性预测项目(CERAPP)数据的一级筛选试验结果的审查。在本研究中,使用这些数据集评估了定量构效关系(QSAR)和对接方法的预测能力。本研究还以西维因(1 - 萘基甲基氨基甲酸酯)为例,提出了一种计算系统生物学方法。对于雌激素受体和雄激素受体结合预测,使用了两种商业和两种开源的QSAR工具,以及公开可用的对接工具Endocrine Disruptome。对于雌激素受体结合预测,ADMET Predictor、VEGA和OCHEM模型(特异性分别为0.88、0.88和0.86,准确性分别为0.81、0.84和0.88)各自比MetaDrug™模型(特异性0.81,准确性0.77)更可靠。对于雄激素受体结合预测,Endocrine Disruptome和ADMET Predictor模型(特异性分别为0.94和0.8,准确性分别为0.78和0.71)比MetaDrug™模型(特异性0.33,准确性0.4)更可靠。提出了一种共识方法,该方法在模型之间达成了普遍共识(特异性0.94,准确性0.89)。本研究将QSAR、对接和系统生物学方法整合为一种用于风险评估的虚拟筛选工具。因此,这种系统生物学途径和网络分析方法提供了一种手段,可更严格地评估内分泌干扰化学物质的潜在影响。