Sharma Gaurav, Powell-Jackson Timothy, Haldar Kaveri, Bradley John, Filippi Véronique
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, England.
Sambodhi Research and Communications, New Delhi, India.
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jun 1;95(6):419-429. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.179291. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
To evaluate the quality of essential care during normal labour and childbirth in maternity facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Between 26 May and 8 July 2015, we used clinical observations to assess care provision for 275 mother-neonate pairs at 26 hospitals. Data on 42 items of care were collected, summarized into 17 clinical practices and three aggregate scores and then weighted to obtain population-based estimates. We examined unadjusted differences in quality between the public and private facilities. Multilevel linear mixed-effects models were used to adjust for birth attendant, facility and maternal characteristics.
The quality of care we observed was generally poor in both private and public facilities; the mean percentage of essential clinical care practices completed for each woman was 35.7%. Weighted estimates indicate that unqualified personnel provided care for 73.0% and 27.0% of the mother-neonate pairs in public and private facilities, respectively. Obstetric, neonatal and overall care at birth appeared better in the private facilities than in the public ones. In the adjusted analysis, the score for overall quality of care in private facilities was found to be six percentage points higher than the corresponding score for public facilities.
In 2015, the personnel providing labour and childbirth care in maternity facilities were often unqualified and adherence to care protocols was generally poor. Initiatives to measure and improve the quality of care during labour and childbirth need to be developed in the private and public facilities in Uttar Pradesh.
评估印度北方邦产科机构中正常分娩期间基本护理的质量。
2015年5月26日至7月8日,我们通过临床观察对26家医院的275对母婴的护理情况进行评估。收集了42项护理数据,归纳为17项临床操作和三项综合评分,然后进行加权以获得基于人群的估计值。我们研究了公立和私立机构在护理质量方面未经调整的差异。使用多级线性混合效应模型对接生人员、机构和产妇特征进行调整。
我们观察到的公立和私立机构的护理质量普遍较差;每位女性完成基本临床护理操作的平均百分比为35.7%。加权估计表明,在公立和私立机构中,分别有73.0%和27.0%的母婴由不合格人员护理。私立机构的产科、新生儿护理及出生时的整体护理似乎优于公立机构。在调整分析中,发现私立机构护理总体质量得分比公立机构相应得分高6个百分点。
2015年,产科机构中提供分娩护理的人员往往不合格,且对护理规范的遵守情况普遍较差。北方邦的公立和私立机构都需要制定措施来衡量和提高分娩期间的护理质量。