Boyd Adele, Synnott Jonathan, Nugent Chris, Elliott David, Kelly John
The Computer Science Research Institute and the School of Computing and Mathematics, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim BT37 0QB, UK.
Redburn Solutions Ltd., Belfast, Co. Down BT3 9DT, UK.
Healthc Technol Lett. 2017 May 5;4(3):93-96. doi: 10.1049/htl.2016.0102. eCollection 2017 Jun.
This study focused on the development and usability evaluation of EnCare diagnostics (ECD) and the brain fit plan (BFP) in healthy older adults, cognitively impaired and physically impaired individuals. ECD is proposed as a novel solution to cognitive assessment based on colour selection. BFP is a novel solution to personalised cognitive stimulation. The study consisted of two trials designed to evaluate the usability of the apps. Trial 1 involved 11 healthy older adults and four older adults with physical impairments who undertook ECD and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) once per month for 4 months with only those with physical impairments also completing the BFP daily. Trial 2 involved eight older adults diagnosed with early stage dementia who completed MMSE and ECD once per month for 6 months. In Trial 1, 10 out of 11 participants enjoyed the trial and managed the usability of the app easily. A 75% drop out was observed in response to the BFP with issues of dexterity and lack of understanding on how to use the technology being the main reasons for lack of compliance. Four out of eight participants completed Trial 2 with most of the participants having no usability issues. This usability study demonstrated that ECD is highly acceptable in both healthy older adults and those with early stage dementia when given the shorter versions to accommodate their diagnosis. The BFP was not suited to this population of participants.
本研究聚焦于针对健康老年人、认知障碍者和身体障碍者的EnCare诊断(ECD)和大脑健康计划(BFP)的开发及可用性评估。ECD被提议作为一种基于颜色选择的认知评估新方法。BFP是一种个性化认知刺激的新方法。该研究包括两项旨在评估应用程序可用性的试验。试验1招募了11名健康老年人和4名身体有障碍的老年人,他们连续4个月每月进行一次ECD和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评估,其中身体有障碍的参与者还需每天完成BFP。试验2招募了8名被诊断为早期痴呆症的老年人,他们连续6个月每月进行一次MMSE和ECD评估。在试验1中,11名参与者中有10名喜欢该试验,并且能够轻松应对应用程序的可用性。观察到有75%的参与者因灵活性问题以及对如何使用该技术缺乏理解等问题而退出BFP,这是导致他们不遵守要求的主要原因。8名参与者中有4名完成了试验2,大多数参与者没有可用性问题。这项可用性研究表明,当提供较短版本以适应他们的诊断时,ECD在健康老年人和早期痴呆症患者中都非常容易被接受。而BFP并不适合这类参与者群体。