Suppr超能文献

一项评估单剂量瞬时受体电位香草酸亚型1(TRPV1)拮抗剂马伐曲普对骨关节炎患者镇痛疗效的随机研究。

A randomized study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a single dose of the TRPV1 antagonist mavatrep in patients with osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Mayorga Arthur J, Flores Christopher M, Trudeau Jeremiah J, Moyer John A, Shalayda Kevin, Dale Mark, Frustaci Mary Ellen, Katz Nathaniel, Manitpisitkul Prasarn, Treister Roi, Ratcliffe Stuart, Romano Gary

机构信息

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptor antagonists have been evaluated in clinical studies for their analgesic effects. Mavatrep, a potent, selective, competitive TRPV1 receptor antagonist has demonstrated pharmacodynamic effects consistent with target engagement at the TRPV1 receptor in a previous single-dose clinical study. The current study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effects of a single dose of mavatrep.

METHODS

In this randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-way crossover, phase 1b study, patients with painful knee osteoarthritis were treated with a single-dose of 50mg mavatrep, 500mg naproxen twice-daily, and placebo. Patients were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment sequences. Each treatment sequence included three treatment periods of 7 days duration with a 7 day washout between each treatment period. The primary efficacy evaluation was pain reduction measured by the 4-h postdose sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) based on the 11-point (0-10) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain after stair-climbing (PASC). The secondary efficacy evaluations included 11-point (0-10) NRS pain scores entered into the Actiwatch between clinic visits, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index subscales (WOMAC) questionnaire, and use of rescue medication. Safety and tolerability of single oral dose mavatrep were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 33 patients randomized, 32 completed the study. A statistically significantly (p<0.1) greater reduction in PASC was observed for mavatrep versus placebo (4-h SPID least square mean [LSM] [SE] difference: 1.5 [0.53]; p=0.005 and 2-h LSM [SE] difference of PID: 0.7 [0.30]; p=0.029). The mean average daily current pain NRS scores were lower in the mavatrep and naproxen treatment arm than in the placebo arm (mavatrep: 7 day mean [SD], 3.72 [1.851]; naproxen: 7 day mean [SD], 3.49 [1.544]; placebo: 7 day mean [SD], 4.9 [1.413]). Mavatrep showed statistically significant improvements as compared with placebo on the WOMAC subscales (pain on days 2 [p=0.049] and 7 [p=0.041], stiffness on day 7 [p=0.075]), and function on day 7 [p=0.077]). The same pattern of improvement was evident for naproxen versus placebo. The mean (SD) number of rescue medication tablets taken during the 7-day treatment period was 4.2 (6.49) for mavatrep treatment, 2.8 (5.42) for naproxen, and 6.3 (8.25) for placebo treatment. All patients that received mavatrep reported at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). Feeling cold (79%), thermohypoesthesia (61%), dysgeusia (58%), paraesthesia (36%), and feeling hot (15%) were the most common TEAEs in the mavatrep group. Total 9% patients receiving mavatrep experienced minor thermal burns. No deaths or serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs occurred.

CONCLUSION

Overall, mavatrep was associated with a significant reduction in pain, stiffness, and physical function when compared with placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Mavatrep's safety profile was consistent with its mechanism of action as a TRPV1 antagonist.

IMPLICATIONS

Further studies are required to evaluate whether lower multiple doses of mavatrep can produce analgesic efficacy while minimizing adverse events, as well as the potential for improved patient counselling techniques to reduce the minor thermal burns related to decreased heat perception.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

2009-010961-21 (EudraCT Number).

摘要

背景/目的:瞬时受体电位香草酸受体1(TRPV1)拮抗剂已在临床研究中评估其镇痛效果。马伐曲普是一种强效、选择性、竞争性TRPV1受体拮抗剂,在之前的一项单剂量临床研究中已证明其药效学作用与TRPV1受体的靶点结合一致。本研究旨在评估单剂量马伐曲普的镇痛效果。

方法

在这项随机、安慰剂和活性对照、三向交叉的1b期研究中,膝骨关节炎疼痛患者接受单剂量50mg马伐曲普、每日两次500mg萘普生和安慰剂治疗。患者被随机分配到6种治疗顺序中的1种。每个治疗顺序包括三个为期7天的治疗期,每个治疗期之间有7天的洗脱期。主要疗效评估是基于爬楼梯后疼痛的11分制(0 - 10)数字评分量表(NRS),通过给药后4小时疼痛强度差值总和(SPID)来衡量疼痛减轻情况。次要疗效评估包括在门诊就诊期间输入Actiwatch的11分制(0 - 10)NRS疼痛评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数子量表(WOMAC)问卷以及急救药物的使用情况。还评估了单剂量口服马伐曲普的安全性和耐受性。

结果

33名随机分组的患者中,32名完成了研究。与安慰剂相比,马伐曲普的PASC降低具有统计学显著意义(p < 0.1)(4小时SPID最小二乘均值[LSM][SE]差值:1.5[0.53];p = 0.005,PID的2小时LSM[SE]差值:0.7[0.30];p = 0.029)。马伐曲普和萘普生治疗组的平均每日当前疼痛NRS评分低于安慰剂组(马伐曲普:7天均值[SD],3.72[1.851];萘普生:7天均值[SD],3.49[1.544];安慰剂:7天均值[SD],4.9[1.413])。与安慰剂相比,马伐曲普在WOMAC子量表上显示出统计学显著改善(第2天[p = 0.049]和第7天[p = 0.041]的疼痛、第7天[p = 0.075]的僵硬以及第7天[p = 0.077]的功能)。萘普生与安慰剂相比也有相同的改善模式。在7天治疗期内,马伐曲普治疗组服用急救药物片的平均(SD)数量为4.2(6.49),萘普生为2.8(5.42),安慰剂为6.3(8.25)。所有接受马伐曲普治疗的患者均报告至少1次治疗出现的不良事件(TEAE)。感觉寒冷(79%)、体温感觉减退(61%)、味觉障碍(58%)、感觉异常(36%)和感觉发热(1十五%)是马伐曲普组最常见的TEAE。接受马伐曲普治疗的患者中总计9%经历了轻度热灼伤。未发生死亡或严重不良事件,也没有因不良事件导致的停药情况。

结论

总体而言,与膝骨关节炎患者的安慰剂相比,马伐曲普与疼痛、僵硬和身体功能的显著降低相关。马伐曲普的安全性概况与其作为TRPV1拮抗剂的作用机制一致。

启示

需要进一步研究以评估较低的多次剂量马伐曲普是否能在将不良事件降至最低的同时产生镇痛效果,以及改进患者咨询技术以减少与热感觉降低相关的轻度热灼伤的可能性。

试验注册

2009 - 010961 - 21(欧洲临床试验数据库编号)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验