Suppr超能文献

在常规临床护理中将疼痛及其他患者症状评估为定量、标准化的“科学”数据。

Assessment of pain and other patient symptoms in routine clinical care as quantitative, standardised, "scientific" data.

作者信息

Chua Jacquelin R, Castrejon Isabel, Pincus Theodore

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 107(5):13-20. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Abstract

Pain is the most common basis for visits to a rheumatologist, and reduction of pain is a primary goal of clinical care. Pain is assessed optimally by the patient on a self-report questionnaire. In clinical trials and other clinical research concerning pain and pain relief, detailed questionnaires are generally completed by patients. However, in routine clinical care, pain is generally assessed only according to narrative descriptions by the physician, and only a minority of settings assess pain using a standard, quantitative measure. Accurate, standard, quantitative assessment of pain in routine care is easily assessed in all patients with all diagnoses on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS), by asking each patient to complete a 2-page multidimensional health assessment questionnaire/routine assessment of patient index data 3 (MDHAQ/RAPID3) at all visits. The MDHAQ includes VAS for pain, patient global assessment, and fatigue, as well as a quantitative physical function scale, RAPID3, review of systems, and recent medical history. The questionnaire provides the doctor with a 10-15 second overview of medical history data that otherwise would require about 10-15 minutes of conversation, saving time for the doctor and patient to focus on the most prominent concerns for the visit. MDHAQ scores from patients with 10 different rheumatic diagnoses, and specific data indicating similarity of scores in patients with osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis on the same questionnaire, are presented to illustrate the value of the MDHAQ in routine care.

摘要

疼痛是患者就诊于风湿病专家的最常见原因,减轻疼痛是临床治疗的主要目标。患者通过自我报告问卷能最有效地评估疼痛。在关于疼痛和疼痛缓解的临床试验及其他临床研究中,详细问卷通常由患者完成。然而,在常规临床护理中,疼痛通常仅根据医生的叙述性描述进行评估,只有少数机构使用标准的定量方法评估疼痛。在常规护理中,通过要求每位患者在每次就诊时完成一份两页的多维健康评估问卷/患者指数数据3常规评估(MDHAQ/RAPID3),所有诊断的患者都能轻松地在0至10的视觉模拟量表(VAS)上对疼痛进行准确、标准的定量评估。MDHAQ包括疼痛的VAS、患者整体评估、疲劳评估,以及定量身体功能量表、RAPID3、系统回顾和近期病史。该问卷为医生提供了一份10至15秒的病史数据概述,否则这需要大约10至15分钟的交谈,为医生和患者节省了时间,使他们能够专注于此次就诊中最突出的问题。文中展示了10种不同风湿性诊断患者的MDHAQ评分,以及同一问卷上骨关节炎患者与类风湿关节炎患者评分相似性的具体数据,以说明MDHAQ在常规护理中的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验