Suppr超能文献

一种基于 HF183/BacR287 定量实时 PCR 方法的人体粪便污染评分,用于对休闲场所进行分级。

A human fecal contamination score for ranking recreational sites using the HF183/BacR287 quantitative real-time PCR method.

机构信息

Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.

出版信息

Water Res. 2018 Jan 1;128:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.071. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

Human fecal pollution of recreational waters remains a public health concern worldwide. As a result, there is a growing interest in the application of human-associated fecal source identification quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technologies for water quality research and management. However, there are currently no standardized approaches for field implementation and interpretation of qPCR data. In this study, a standardized HF183/BacR287 qPCR method was combined with a water sampling strategy and a novel Bayesian weighted average approach to establish a human fecal contamination score (HFS) that can be used to prioritize sampling sites for remediation based on measured human waste levels. The HFS was then used to investigate 975 study design scenarios utilizing different combinations of sites with varying sampling intensities (daily to once per week) and number of qPCR replicates per sample (2-14 replicates). Findings demonstrate that site prioritization with HFS is feasible and that both sampling intensity and number of qPCR replicates influence reliability of HFS estimates. The novel data analysis strategy presented here provides a prescribed approach for the implementation and interpretation of human-associated HF183/BacR287 qPCR data with the goal of site prioritization based on human fecal pollution levels. In addition, information is provided for future users to customize study designs for optimal HFS performance.

摘要

人类粪便污染休闲水域仍然是全球公共卫生关注的问题。因此,人们越来越关注将人类相关粪便源识别定量实时 PCR(qPCR)技术应用于水质研究和管理。然而,目前还没有标准化的方法来进行现场实施和解释 qPCR 数据。在这项研究中,标准化的 HF183/BacR287 qPCR 方法与一种水样采集策略和一种新的贝叶斯加权平均方法相结合,建立了一个人类粪便污染评分(HFS),可用于根据测量的人类废物水平优先选择修复采样点。然后,使用 HFS 研究了 975 种不同的研究设计方案,这些方案结合了不同采样强度(每天至每周一次)和每个样品的 qPCR 重复次数(2-14 次)的不同采样点组合。研究结果表明,使用 HFS 进行站点优先级排序是可行的,并且采样强度和 qPCR 重复次数都会影响 HFS 估计的可靠性。这里提出的新数据分析策略为实施和解释基于人类粪便污染水平的人类相关 HF183/BacR287 qPCR 数据提供了一种规定的方法。此外,还为未来的用户提供了定制研究设计以获得最佳 HFS 性能的信息。

相似文献

1
A human fecal contamination score for ranking recreational sites using the HF183/BacR287 quantitative real-time PCR method.
Water Res. 2018 Jan 1;128:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.071. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
2
Data Acceptance Criteria for Standardized Human-Associated Fecal Source Identification Quantitative Real-Time PCR Methods.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Apr 18;82(9):2773-2782. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03661-15. Print 2016 May.
5
Improved HF183 quantitative real-time PCR assay for characterization of human fecal pollution in ambient surface water samples.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3086-94. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04137-13. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Variable fecal source prioritization in recreational waters routinely monitored with viral and bacterial general indicators.
Water Res. 2021 Mar 15;192:116845. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116845. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
7
Assessment of fecal pollution in Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Apr;129(2):655-663. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.053. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Frequent detection of a human fecal indicator in the urban ocean: environmental drivers and covariation with enterococci.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Mar 1;20(3):480-492. doi: 10.1039/c7em00594f. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
10
Performance of human fecal anaerobe-associated PCR-based assays in a multi-laboratory method evaluation study.
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.060. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental surveillance for Salmonella Typhi to detect the typhoid burden in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2025 May;266:114572. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114572. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
2
Quantitative fecal pollution assessment with bacterial, viral, and molecular methods in small stream tributaries.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175740. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175740. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Quantitative fecal source characterization of urban municipal storm sewer system outfall 'wet' and 'dry' weather discharges.
Water Res. 2024 Aug 1;259:121857. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121857. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
5
A fecal score approximation model for analysis of real-time quantitative PCR fecal source identification measurements.
Water Res. 2024 May 15;255:121482. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121482. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
6
Fecal Impairment Framework, A New Conceptual Framework for Assessing Fecal Contamination in Recreational Waters.
Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;73(2):443-456. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01878-x. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
8
Genetic fecal source identification in urban streams impacted by municipal separate storm sewer system discharges.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0278548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278548. eCollection 2023.
9
Variable fecal source prioritization in recreational waters routinely monitored with viral and bacterial general indicators.
Water Res. 2021 Mar 15;192:116845. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116845. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
10
Markers Specific to Group Bacteria as Indicators of Anthropogenic Pollution of Surface Waters.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 29;17(19):7137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197137.

本文引用的文献

3
Data Acceptance Criteria for Standardized Human-Associated Fecal Source Identification Quantitative Real-Time PCR Methods.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Apr 18;82(9):2773-2782. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03661-15. Print 2016 May.
4
6
Improved HF183 quantitative real-time PCR assay for characterization of human fecal pollution in ambient surface water samples.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3086-94. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04137-13. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
7
Performance of human fecal anaerobe-associated PCR-based assays in a multi-laboratory method evaluation study.
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.060. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
8
Recommendations following a multi-laboratory comparison of microbial source tracking methods.
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6829-38. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.063. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
10
Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6812-28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.046. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验