Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Rm 5-16, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 7W9, Canada.
Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1062-5.
Fellowship training follows certification in a primary specialty or subspecialty and focusses on distinct and advanced clinical and/or academic skills. This phase of medical education is growing in prevalence, but has been an "invisible phase of postgraduate training" lacking standards for education and accreditation, as well as funding. We aimed to explore fellowship programs and examine the reasons to host and participate in fellowship training, seeking to inform the future development of fellowship education.
During the 2013-14 academic year, we conducted interviews and focus groups to examine the current status of fellowship training from the perspectives of division heads, fellowship directors and current fellows at the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the prevailing status of fellowship training. A process of data reduction, data analysis and conclusions/verifications was performed to analyse the quantitative data.
We interviewed 16 division heads (94%), 15 fellowship directors (63%) and 8 fellows (21%). We identified three distinct types of fellowships. Individualized fellowships focus on the career goals of the trainee and/or the recruitment goals of the division. Clinical fellowships focus on the attainment of clinical expertise over and above the competencies of residency. Research fellowships focus on research productivity. Participants identified a variety of reasons to offer fellowships: improve academic productivity; improve clinical productivity; share/develop enhanced clinical expertise; recruit future faculty members/attain an academic position; enhance the reputation of the division/department/trainee; and enhance the scholarly environment.
Fellowships serve a variety of purposes which benefit both individual trainees as well as the academic enterprise. Fellowships can be categorized within a distinct taxonomy: individualized; clinical; and research. Each type of fellowship may serve a variety of purposes, and each may need distinct support and resources. Further research is needed to catalogue the operational requirements for hosting and undertaking fellowship training, and establish recommendations for educational and administrative policy and processes in this new phase of postgraduate education.
住院医师培训紧随主要专业或亚专业认证之后,专注于独特而先进的临床和/或学术技能。医学教育的这一阶段越来越普遍,但作为研究生培训的“无形阶段”,它缺乏教育和认证标准以及资金。我们旨在探讨住院医师培训计划,并研究举办和参与住院医师培训的原因,以期为住院医师教育的未来发展提供信息。
在 2013-14 学年,我们对加拿大渥太华大学医学系的系主任、住院医师培训主任和现任住院医师进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论,以从他们的角度探讨住院医师培训的现状。描述性统计数据用于描绘住院医师培训的普遍现状。通过数据缩减、数据分析和结论/验证的过程来分析定量数据。
我们采访了 16 位系主任(94%)、15 位培训主任(63%)和 8 位住院医师(21%)。我们确定了三种不同类型的住院医师培训。个体化培训侧重于培训者的职业目标和/或系的招聘目标。临床培训侧重于在住院医师培训的基础上获得临床专业知识。研究培训侧重于研究生产力。参与者提出了提供住院医师培训的各种理由:提高学术生产力;提高临床生产力;分享/发展增强的临床专业知识;招聘未来的教职员工/获得学术职位;提升系/部门/培训者的声誉;以及加强学术环境。
住院医师培训有多种用途,既有利于个体培训者,也有利于学术事业。住院医师培训可以归入一个明确的分类法:个体化、临床和研究。每种类型的住院医师培训都可能有多种用途,并且每种类型可能需要不同的支持和资源。需要进一步研究以编目举办和进行住院医师培训的运营要求,并为这一新阶段的研究生教育建立教育和管理政策和流程方面的建议。