Suppr超能文献

为了符合新的欧盟一般数据保护条例,在研究目的下处理基因数据的规则。

Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation.

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d-box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Feb;26(2):149-156. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0045-7. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

Abstract

Genetic data contain sensitive health and non-health-related information about the individuals and their family members. Therefore, adopting adequate privacy safeguards is paramount when processing genetic data for research or clinical purposes. One of the major legal instruments for personal data protection in the EU is the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which has entered into force in May 2016 and repealed the Directive 95/46/EC, with an ultimate goal of enhancing effectiveness and harmonization of personal data protection in the EU. This paper explores the major provisions of the new Regulation with regard to processing genetic data, and assesses the influence of such provisions on reinforcing the legal safeguards when sharing genetic data for research purposes. The new Regulation attempts to elucidate the scope of personal data, by recognizing pseudonymized data as personal (identifiable) data, and including genetic data in the catalog of special categories of data (sensitive data). Moreover, a set of new rules is laid out in the Regulation for processing personal data under the scientific research exemption. For instance, further use of genetic data for scientific research purposes, without obtaining additional consent will be allowed, if the specific conditions is met. The new Regulation has already fueled concerns among various stakeholders, owing to the challenges that may emerge when implementing the Regulation across the countries. Notably, the provided definition for pseudonymized data has been criticized because it leaves too much room for interpretations, and it might undermine the harmonization of the data protection across the countries.

摘要

遗传数据包含有关个体及其家庭成员的敏感健康和非健康相关信息。因此,在为研究或临床目的处理遗传数据时,采取充分的隐私保护措施至关重要。欧盟个人数据保护的主要法律工具之一是新的《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR),该条例于 2016 年 5 月生效,取代了第 95/46/EC 号指令,其最终目标是加强欧盟个人数据保护的有效性和协调一致性。本文探讨了新条例中关于处理遗传数据的主要规定,并评估了这些规定对加强为研究目的共享遗传数据的法律保障的影响。新条例试图通过将化名数据视为个人(可识别)数据,并将遗传数据纳入特殊类别数据(敏感数据)目录,来阐明个人数据的范围。此外,条例还为科研豁免下的个人数据处理制定了一套新规则。例如,如果满足特定条件,将允许在不获得额外同意的情况下,进一步将遗传数据用于科研目的。由于在各国实施该条例可能会出现挑战,新条例已经引起了各利益相关方的关注。值得注意的是,对化名数据的规定受到了批评,因为它给解释留下了太多的空间,可能会破坏各国之间的数据保护协调一致性。

相似文献

1
Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Feb;26(2):149-156. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0045-7. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
2
The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug;27(8):1159-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0386-5. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on health research.
Br Med Bull. 2018 Dec 1;128(1):109-118. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy038.
5
General Data Protection Regulation in Health Clinics.
J Med Syst. 2020 Jan 10;44(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-1521-0.
6
The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Jan 3;11:709. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.709. eCollection 2017.
7
Canada: will privacy rules continue to favour open science?
Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1905-0. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

2
The rise of open data practices among bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328065. eCollection 2025.
3
Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.
J Community Genet. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4.
4
Deriving risk-adapted starting ages of breast cancer screening according to polygenic risk score.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Apr 30;9(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf056.
5
Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;22(4):903-919. doi: 10.7150/ijms.101219. eCollection 2025.
6
AI and ML-based risk assessment of chemicals: predicting carcinogenic risk from chemical-induced genomic instability.
Front Toxicol. 2024 Nov 26;6:1461587. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1461587. eCollection 2024.
7
Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Oct 31;18:26323524241281748. doi: 10.1177/26323524241281748. eCollection 2024.
8
Mendelian Randomization Studies in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2024 Sep;13(3):280-291. doi: 10.12997/jla.2024.13.3.280. Epub 2024 May 27.
9
Attention to the Values, Wishes and Needs of Patients With Advanced Cancer by Hospital Clinicians, an Exploratory Qualitative Study.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Mar;42(3):300-308. doi: 10.1177/10499091241261025. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
10
'It is important to feel invited': what patients require when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary - 4 Dimensional, a qualitative exploration.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 20;18:26323524241260426. doi: 10.1177/26323524241260426. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of the General Data Protection Regulation on Medical Research.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 24;19(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7108.
2
The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Jan 3;11:709. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.709. eCollection 2017.
3
The discombobulation of de-identification.
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Nov 8;34(11):1102-1103. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3696.
4
Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data.
Hugo J. 2014 Dec;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s11568-014-0003-1. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
5
Consent and confidentiality in the light of recent demands for data sharing.
Biom J. 2017 Mar;59(2):240-250. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500044. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jul;24(7):956-60. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.239. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees.
EMBO Mol Med. 2015 May;7(5):507-9. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201405002.
8
Regulating genetic information--exploring the options in legal theory.
Eur J Health Law. 2014 Dec;21(5):425-53. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341335.
9
International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;23(6):721-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.197. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
10
Data protection and consent to biomedical research: a step forward?
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):855. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61488-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验