Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Biostatistics Group, Dean's Department, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jan 23;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1120-7.
Health professional racial/ethnic bias may impact on clinical decision-making and contribute to subsequent ethnic health inequities. However, limited research has been undertaken among medical students. This paper presents findings from the Bias and Decision-Making in Medicine (BDMM) study, which sought to examine ethnic bias (Māori (indigenous peoples) compared with New Zealand European) among medical students and associations with clinical decision-making.
All final year New Zealand (NZ) medical students in 2014 and 2015 (n = 888) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional online study. Key components included: two chronic disease vignettes (cardiovascular disease (CVD) and depression) with randomized patient ethnicity (Māori or NZ European) and questions on patient management; implicit bias measures (an ethnicity preference Implicit Association Test (IAT) and an ethnicity and compliant patient IAT); and, explicit ethnic bias questions. Associations between ethnic bias and clinical decision-making responses to vignettes were tested using linear regression.
Three hundred and two students participated (34% response rate). Implicit and explicit ethnic bias favoring NZ Europeans was apparent among medical students. In the CVD vignette, no significant differences in clinical decision-making by patient ethnicity were observed. There were also no differential associations by patient ethnicity between any measures of ethnic bias (implicit or explicit) and patient management responses in the CVD vignette. In the depression vignette, some differences in the ranking of recommended treatment options were observed by patient ethnicity and explicit preference for NZ Europeans was associated with increased reporting that NZ European patients would benefit from treatment but not Māori (slope difference 0.34, 95% CI 0.08, 0.60; p = 0.011), although this was the only significant finding in these analyses.
NZ medical students demonstrated ethnic bias, although overall this was not associated with clinical decision-making. This study both adds to the small body of literature internationally on racial/ethnic bias among medical students and provides relevant and important information for medical education on indigenous health and ethnic health inequities in New Zealand.
医疗专业人员的种族/民族偏见可能会影响临床决策,并导致随后的种族健康不平等。然而,针对医学生的相关研究较少。本文呈现了“医学中的偏见与决策(BDMM)”研究的结果,该研究旨在检验医学生中的种族偏见(毛利人(土著)与新西兰欧洲人)及其与临床决策的关联。
2014 年和 2015 年,所有新西兰(NZ)医学专业的应届毕业生(n=888)都被邀请参与一项横断面在线研究。主要内容包括:两个慢性病案例(心血管疾病(CVD)和抑郁症),患者的种族随机分配(毛利人或新西兰欧洲人),以及关于患者管理的问题;内隐偏见测量(一种基于种族的偏好内隐联想测验(IAT)和一种基于种族和顺从患者的 IAT);以及明确的种族偏见问题。使用线性回归检验种族偏见与案例反应之间的关联。
302 名学生参与(回应率 34%)。医学生中存在明显的偏向新西兰欧洲人的内隐和外显种族偏见。在 CVD 案例中,患者种族对临床决策没有显著影响。在 CVD 案例中,任何种族偏见测量(内隐或外显)与患者管理反应之间也没有因患者种族而产生的不同关联。在抑郁症案例中,根据患者的种族,推荐的治疗选择的排序存在一些差异,对新西兰欧洲人的明显偏好与更多报告新西兰欧洲患者将受益于治疗而非毛利人有关(斜率差 0.34,95%置信区间 0.08,0.60;p=0.011),尽管这是这些分析中唯一的显著发现。
新西兰医学生表现出种族偏见,尽管总体上这与临床决策无关。这项研究既增加了国际上关于医学生种族/民族偏见的文献数量,也为新西兰医学教育提供了有关土著健康和种族健康不平等的相关和重要信息。