Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Apr;479:166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Clinicians regularly observe increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentrations in patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The challenge is to differentiate acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from increased hs-cTn results across a range of eGFR. The objective of this study was to determined the optimal hs-cTn concentrations for acute myocardial infarction (MI) and a composite cardiovascular outcome across different eGFR ranges and to assess the utility of a low hs-cTn cutoff to rule-out events.
We undertook an observational study in the emergency department of patients (n = 1212) with symptoms suggestive of ACS who had an eGFR and at least one Roche hs-cTnT and one Abbott hs-cTnI result. The 7-day outcomes were MI or a composite of MI, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, serious ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, or death. The maximum hs-cTn concentration was assessed across different eGFR ranges (<30,30-59,60-89,≥90 ml/min/1.73m) by spearman correlation, ROC-curve analyses, and sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for the proposed rule-out hs-cTn cutoffs (hs-cTnI<5 ng/l and hs-cTnT<6 ng/l) for the outcomes.
Both hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT concentrations were negatively correlated with eGFR. The lower the eGFR, the lower the AUC and the higher the optimal hs-cTn cutoffs for both MI and the composite outcome. The highest combined sensitivity (100%), NPV (100%) and proportion of low-risk for MI (45% of group) was observed for patients with hs-cTnT<6 ng/l with an eGFR≥90.
The test performance for hs-cTn for diagnosing or ruling-out an acute cardiac event varies per the eGFR. Accurate risk stratification requires knowledge of the eGFR.
临床医生经常观察到肾小球滤过率(eGFR)较低的患者中心肌钙蛋白 I(hs-cTn)浓度升高。挑战在于区分急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和一系列 eGFR 升高的 hs-cTn 结果。本研究旨在确定不同 eGFR 范围内急性心肌梗死(MI)和复合心血管结局的最佳 hs-cTn 浓度,并评估低 hs-cTn 截断值排除事件的效用。
我们对急诊科有 ACS 症状且 eGFR 至少有一个罗氏 hs-cTnT 和一个雅培 hs-cTnI 结果的患者(n=1212)进行了一项观察性研究。7 天的结局为 MI 或 MI 复合、不稳定型心绞痛、充血性心力衰竭、严重室性心律失常或死亡。通过 Spearman 相关、ROC 曲线分析以及建议的排除 hs-cTn 截断值(hs-cTnI<5ng/l 和 hs-cTnT<6ng/l)对不同 eGFR 范围(<30、30-59、60-89、≥90ml/min/1.73m)下最大 hs-cTn 浓度的敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)进行评估。
hs-cTnI 和 hs-cTnT 浓度与 eGFR 呈负相关。eGFR 越低,AUC 越低,hs-cTn 截断值越高,用于 MI 和复合结局的截断值越高。对于 eGFR≥90 的患者,hs-cTnT<6ng/l 时观察到最高的联合敏感性(100%)、NPV(100%)和 MI 低危比例(45%)。
hs-cTn 用于诊断或排除急性心脏事件的检测性能因 eGFR 而异。准确的风险分层需要了解 eGFR。