Department of Biology, University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Brain Res Bull. 2018 May;139:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the leading causes of dementia, and its prevalence is expected to increase dramatically due to the aging global population. Microglia-driven neuroinflammation may contribute to the progression of AD. Microglia, the immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), become chronically activated by the pathological proteins of AD including amyloid-β peptides (Aβ). Such adversely activated microglia secrete mediators that promote inflammation and damage neurons. Cathepsins are proteases that are expressed by all brain cell types, and most of them are found both intra- and extra-cellularly. Microglia express and secrete several different cathepsins, which support various immune functions of microglia, in addition to their involvement in key neuroinflammatory pathways. This review focuses specifically on microglial cathepsins B, D and S, which have been implicated in AD pathogenesis; we identify their roles relevant to microglial involvement in AD pathogenesis. As dysregulated microglial function and neuroinflammation can contribute to AD progression, cathepsins should be considered as potential therapeutic targets for the development of effective AD treatment options. We conclude that the specific inhibition of microglial cathepsin B may lead to neuroprotective outcomes in AD, while the functions of this cysteine protease in neurons appears to be very complex and further studies are required to fully elucidate the pathophysiological role of neuronal cathepsin B. Examination of the CNS roles of cathepsins is limited by the shortage of highly selective inhibitors, with CA-074 being the only available specific cathepsin B inhibitor. We also conclude that non-specific inhibition of aspartic proteases, including cathepsin D, may promote adverse CNS effects, and may not be safe as AD therapeutics. Finally, cathepsin S inhibition has shown promise in preclinical studies due to its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects; however, the many homeostatic roles of cathepsin S must be considered during the subsequent stages of development of cathepsin S inhibitors as AD therapeutics. Discovery of novel, highly selective inhibitors of various cathepsins and their clinical testing are required for the development of effective future AD therapies.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是痴呆症的主要病因之一,由于全球人口老龄化,其患病率预计将大幅上升。小胶质细胞驱动的神经炎症可能导致 AD 的进展。小胶质细胞是中枢神经系统(CNS)的免疫细胞,通过 AD 的病理蛋白(包括淀粉样β肽(Aβ))而被慢性激活。这种被激活的小胶质细胞会分泌促进炎症和损伤神经元的介质。组织蛋白酶是一种由所有脑细胞类型表达的蛋白酶,其中大多数存在于细胞内和细胞外。小胶质细胞表达和分泌几种不同的组织蛋白酶,这些组织蛋白酶支持小胶质细胞的各种免疫功能,此外还参与关键的神经炎症途径。本综述专门关注与 AD 发病机制相关的小胶质细胞组织蛋白酶 B、D 和 S;我们确定了它们在小胶质细胞参与 AD 发病机制中的作用。由于失调的小胶质细胞功能和神经炎症可能导致 AD 进展,因此组织蛋白酶应被视为开发有效 AD 治疗方法的潜在治疗靶点。我们的结论是,特异性抑制小胶质细胞组织蛋白酶 B 可能导致 AD 中的神经保护作用,而这种半胱氨酸蛋白酶在神经元中的功能似乎非常复杂,需要进一步研究才能充分阐明神经元组织蛋白酶 B 的病理生理作用。由于缺乏高度选择性的抑制剂,对组织蛋白酶在中枢神经系统中的作用的研究受到限制,CA-074 是唯一可用的特异性组织蛋白酶 B 抑制剂。我们还得出结论,包括组织蛋白酶 D 在内的天冬氨酸蛋白酶的非特异性抑制可能会促进不利的中枢神经系统效应,并且作为 AD 治疗剂可能不安全。最后,由于组织蛋白酶 S 的神经保护和抗炎作用,其抑制作用在临床前研究中显示出前景;然而,在开发组织蛋白酶 S 抑制剂作为 AD 治疗剂的后续阶段,必须考虑组织蛋白酶 S 的许多动态平衡作用。需要发现各种组织蛋白酶的新型、高度选择性抑制剂,并对其进行临床测试,以开发有效的未来 AD 治疗方法。