Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales , Australia ; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , United Kingdom ; Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences , Kaunas , Lithuania ; and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , United Kingdom.
Physiol Rev. 2018 Apr 1;98(2):813-880. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2017.
Neuronal cell death occurs extensively during development and pathology, where it is especially important because of the limited capacity of adult neurons to proliferate or be replaced. The concept of cell death used to be simple as there were just two or three types, so we just had to work out which type was involved in our particular pathology and then block it. However, we now know that there are at least a dozen ways for neurons to die, that blocking a particular mechanism of cell death may not prevent the cell from dying, and that non-neuronal cells also contribute to neuronal death. We review here the mechanisms of neuronal death by intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, oncosis, necroptosis, parthanatos, ferroptosis, sarmoptosis, autophagic cell death, autosis, autolysis, paraptosis, pyroptosis, phagoptosis, and mitochondrial permeability transition. We next explore the mechanisms of neuronal death during development, and those induced by axotomy, aberrant cell-cycle reentry, glutamate (excitoxicity and oxytosis), loss of connected neurons, aggregated proteins and the unfolded protein response, oxidants, inflammation, and microglia. We then reassess which forms of cell death occur in stroke and Alzheimer's disease, two of the most important pathologies involving neuronal cell death. We also discuss why it has been so difficult to pinpoint the type of neuronal death involved, if and why the mechanism of neuronal death matters, the molecular overlap and interplay between death subroutines, and the therapeutic implications of these multiple overlapping forms of neuronal death.
神经元细胞死亡在发育和病理学中广泛发生,这一点尤为重要,因为成年神经元的增殖或替代能力有限。过去,细胞死亡的概念很简单,因为只有两种或三种类型,所以我们只需要确定哪种类型与我们特定的病理学有关,然后阻止它。然而,我们现在知道,神经元死亡至少有十二种方式,阻断特定的细胞死亡机制可能无法阻止细胞死亡,而且非神经元细胞也会导致神经元死亡。我们在这里回顾了由内在和外在凋亡、胀亡、坏死性凋亡、副凋亡、铁死亡、sarmoptosis、自噬性细胞死亡、自溶、自噬、副凋亡、细胞焦亡、吞噬性细胞死亡和线粒体通透性转换引起的神经元死亡机制。接下来,我们探讨了神经元在发育过程中以及在轴突切断、异常细胞周期再进入、谷氨酸(兴奋毒性和氧化毒性)、失连神经元、聚集蛋白和未折叠蛋白反应、氧化剂、炎症和小胶质细胞诱导下的死亡机制。然后,我们重新评估了细胞死亡的形式发生在中风和阿尔茨海默病,这两种涉及神经元细胞死亡的最重要的病理学。我们还讨论了为什么确定涉及的神经元死亡类型如此困难,如果和为什么神经元死亡的机制很重要,死亡子程序之间的分子重叠和相互作用,以及这些多种重叠形式的神经元死亡的治疗意义。