O'Neil Carol E, Nicklas Theresa A, Fulgoni Victor L
School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 261 Knapp Hall, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, 1100 Bates Street; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
AIMS Public Health. 2015 Aug 3;2(3):441-468. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.3.441. eCollection 2015.
Most studies showing that children consuming breakfast have better nutrient intakes, diet quality, and lower weight than breakfast skippers have the incorrect premise that breakfast meals are homogeneous. The purpose of this study was to classify breakfast meals into patterns and determine the association of the breakfast patterns with daily and breakfast nutrient intakes, diet quality, and weight. Data from children (2-18 years of age; N = 14,200) participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2008 were used. Intake was determined from one day 24-hour dietary recalls. Diet quality was measured using the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005). Body mass index (BMI) z-scores were determined. Twelve patterns (including No Breakfast [∼19% of population]), explaining 63% of the variance in energy from breakfast, were examined. Covariate adjusted general linear models were used to compare outcome variables of consumers of different patterns with breakfast skippers. The p value was Bonferroni corrected (< 0.05/12 = < 0.0042). Consumers of the Eggs/Grain/Meat, Poultry, Fish (MPF)/ Fruit Juice (FJ) and MPF/ Grain/FJ patterns showed higher daily intakes of saturated fats, solid fats, and sodium and lower daily intakes of added sugars than breakfast skippers. Consumers of most breakfast patterns showed higher daily intakes of some nutrients of public health concern (dietary fiber, vitamin D, calcium, and potassium); however, those consuming the Grain or MPF/Grain/FJ pattern did not. Consumers of the Grain/Lower Fat Milk (LFM)/Sweets/FJ, Presweetened (PS) Ready-to-eat Cereal (RTEC)/ LFM, RTEC/LFM, Cooked Cereal/Milk/FJ, and Whole Fruit patterns had higher total HEI-2005 scores than breakfast skippers; those consuming the MPF/ Grain/FJ pattern had lower diet quality than breakfast skippers. Consumption of the Grain/ LFM/Sweets/FJ, PSRTEC/whole milk, Soft Drinks/ FJ/Grain/Potatoes, RTEC/whole milk, and Cooked Cereal/ Milk/ FJ patterns was associated with lower BMI z-scores than seen in breakfast skippers. There are dietary and weight advantages of consuming breakfast, especially breakfasts that include grains, cereals, LFM, and fruit/ FJ, in contrast to the potential adverse effects of skipping breakfast.
大多数研究表明,吃早餐的儿童比不吃早餐的儿童有更好的营养摄入、饮食质量且体重更低,但这些研究有一个错误的前提,即早餐都是一样的。本研究的目的是将早餐分类为不同模式,并确定早餐模式与每日及早餐营养摄入、饮食质量和体重之间的关联。使用了参与2001 - 2008年国家健康与营养检查调查的2 - 18岁儿童(N = 14200)的数据。摄入量通过一天的24小时饮食回顾来确定。饮食质量使用2005年健康饮食指数(HEI - 2005)进行衡量。计算身体质量指数(BMI)z分数。研究了12种模式(包括不吃早餐[约占人口的19%]),这些模式解释了早餐能量差异的63%。使用协变量调整的一般线性模型来比较不同模式的食用者与不吃早餐者的结果变量。p值经邦费罗尼校正(< 0.05 / 12 = < 0.0042)。鸡蛋/谷物/肉、禽、鱼(MPF)/果汁(FJ)模式和MPF/谷物/FJ模式的食用者比不吃早餐者的饱和脂肪、固体脂肪和钠的每日摄入量更高,添加糖的每日摄入量更低。大多数早餐模式的食用者某些对公共健康有重要意义的营养素(膳食纤维、维生素D、钙和钾)的每日摄入量更高;然而,食用谷物或MPF/谷物/FJ模式的人并非如此。谷物/低脂牛奶(LFM)/甜食/FJ、预加糖(PS)即食谷物(RTEC)/LFM、RTEC/LFM、煮制谷物/牛奶/FJ和全水果模式的食用者的HEI - 2005总分比不吃早餐者更高;食用MPF/谷物/FJ模式的人饮食质量比不吃早餐者更低。食用谷物/LFM/甜食/FJ、PS RTEC/全脂牛奶、软饮料/FJ/谷物/土豆、RTEC/全脂牛奶和煮制谷物/牛奶/FJ模式与比不吃早餐者更低的BMI z分数相关。吃早餐有饮食和体重方面的优势,特别是包含谷物、谷类、LFM以及水果/FJ的早餐,与之形成对比的是不吃早餐可能产生的不良影响。