National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia; Department of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia; The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia.
National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia; The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia.
Hear Res. 2018 Aug;365:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Recent animal studies have shown that the synapses between inner hair cells and the dendrites of the spiral ganglion cells they innervate are the elements in the cochlea most vulnerable to excessive noise exposure. Particularly in rodents, several studies have concluded that exposure to high level octave-band noise for 2 h leads to an irreversible loss of around 50% of synaptic ribbons, leaving audiometric hearing thresholds unaltered. Cochlear synaptopathy following noise exposure is hypothesized to degrade the neural encoding of sounds at the subcortical level, which would help explain certain listening-in-noise difficulties reported by some subjects with otherwise 'normal' hearing. In response to this peripheral damage, increased gain of central stages of the auditory system has been observed across several species of mammals, particularly in association with tinnitus. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude and waves I-V amplitude ratio have been suggested as non-invasive indicators of cochlear synaptopathy and central gain activation respectively, but the evidence for these hearing disorders in humans is inconclusive. In this study, we evaluated the influence of lifetime noise exposure (LNE) on the human ABR and on speech-in-noise intelligibility performance in a large cohort of adults aged 29 to 55. Despite large inter-subject variability, results showed a moderate, but statistically significant, negative correlation between the ABR wave I amplitude and LNE, consistent with cochlear synaptopathy. The results also showed (a) that central gain mechanisms observed in animal studies might also occur in humans, in which higher stages of the auditory pathway appear to compensate for reduced input from the cochlea; (b) that tinnitus was associated with activation of central gain mechanisms; (c) that relevant cognitive and subcortical factors influence speech-in-noise intelligibility, in particular, longer ABR waves I-V interpeak latencies were associated with poorer performance in understanding speech in noise when central gain mechanisms were active; and (d) absence of a significant relationship between LNE and tinnitus, central gain activation or speech-in-noise performance. Although this study supports the possible existence of cochlear synaptopathy in humans, the great degree of variability, the lack of uniformity in central gain activation and the significant involvement of attention in speech-in-noise performance suggests that noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy is, at most, one of several factors that play a role in humans' speech-in-noise performance.
最近的动物研究表明,内毛细胞和它们支配的螺旋神经节细胞树突之间的突触是耳蜗中对过度噪声暴露最敏感的元素。特别是在啮齿类动物中,几项研究得出结论,暴露于 2 小时的高 octave-band 噪声会导致大约 50%的突触带不可逆地丢失,而听阈不变。噪声暴露后的耳蜗突触病被假设会降低亚皮质水平声音的神经编码,这有助于解释某些听力正常的受试者报告的某些噪声下的听力困难。为了应对这种外周损伤,几种哺乳动物的听觉系统中枢阶段的增益增加已经被观察到,特别是与耳鸣有关。听觉脑干反应 (ABR) 波 I 幅度和波 I-V 幅度比已被建议分别作为耳蜗突触病和中枢增益激活的非侵入性指标,但这些听力障碍在人类中的证据尚无定论。在这项研究中,我们评估了终生噪声暴露 (LNE) 对人类 ABR 和大样本成年人言语噪声可懂度的影响,年龄在 29 岁至 55 岁之间。尽管个体间存在很大的可变性,但结果表明,ABR 波 I 幅度与 LNE 之间存在中度但具有统计学意义的负相关,这与耳蜗突触病一致。结果还表明:(a)动物研究中观察到的中枢增益机制也可能发生在人类中,其中听觉通路的更高阶段似乎补偿了耳蜗输入的减少;(b)耳鸣与中枢增益机制的激活有关;(c)相关认知和皮质下因素会影响言语噪声可懂度,特别是当中枢增益机制活跃时,较长的 ABR 波 I-V 峰间潜伏期与噪声中理解言语的较差表现相关;(d)LNE 与耳鸣、中枢增益激活或言语噪声表现之间没有显著关系。尽管这项研究支持人类可能存在耳蜗突触病,但由于可变性很大、中枢增益激活缺乏一致性以及注意力在言语噪声表现中起着重要作用,表明噪声诱导的耳蜗突触病最多只是影响人类言语噪声表现的几个因素之一。