Suppr超能文献

基于 PCR 的分子分析对胶质瘤患者日常诊断的影响。

Impact of PCR-based molecular analysis in daily diagnosis for the patient with gliomas.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.

出版信息

Brain Tumor Pathol. 2018 Jul;35(3):141-147. doi: 10.1007/s10014-018-0322-3. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Abstract

The WHO2016 CNS update requires a combined histological and molecular assessment. To assess the major aberrations such as co-deletion of complete chromosome arms 1p and 19q (Co-del), isocitrate dehydrogenase and histone H3 mutations, direct sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and/or FISH are methods considered to be "golden standard" in the community. However, these methods are expensive and complicated. The aim of this study is verification of the sensitivity of the simple PCR-based techniques for assessment of molecular information in daily diagnosis. We analyzed a total number of 80 patients with gliomas. FISH and PCR-based microsatellite analysis were compared for Co-del assessment. Direct sequencing and qPCR using hig-resolution melting (HRM) were compared for IDH and histone H3 mutations. The sensitivity and specificity of FISH were 0.71 and 0.79, respectively. FISH using a commercially available Vysis probe had a risk of high false-positive rate (0.25). For assessment of IDH1 mutations, the sensitivity and specificity of HRM were 1.0 and 0.96, respectively. For assessment of IDH2 and H3 mutations by HRM, both sensitivity and specificity were 1.0. We consider PCR-based molecular analysis to be a simple and accurate technique in daily diagnosis that is readily available for a small scientific facility.

摘要

世界卫生组织 2016 年中枢神经系统更新要求进行联合组织学和分子评估。为了评估主要异常,如完全染色体臂 1p 和 19q 的共同缺失(Co-del)、异柠檬酸脱氢酶和组蛋白 H3 突变,直接测序、多重连接依赖性探针扩增和/或荧光原位杂交等方法被认为是该领域的“金标准”。然而,这些方法昂贵且复杂。本研究旨在验证基于 PCR 的简单技术在日常诊断中评估分子信息的敏感性。我们分析了总共 80 名胶质瘤患者。比较了 FISH 和基于 PCR 的微卫星分析以评估 Co-del。比较了直接测序和使用高分辨率熔解(HRM)的 qPCR 以评估 IDH 和组蛋白 H3 突变。FISH 的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.71 和 0.79。使用市售 Vysis 探针的 FISH 有高假阳性率(0.25)的风险。对于 IDH1 突变的评估,HRM 的敏感性和特异性分别为 1.0 和 0.96。对于 HRM 评估 IDH2 和 H3 突变,敏感性和特异性均为 1.0。我们认为基于 PCR 的分子分析是一种简单、准确的技术,对于小型科研机构来说易于获得。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验