Damnjanović Kaja, Graeber Johanna, Ilić Sandra, Lam Wing Y, Lep Žan, Morales Sara, Pulkkinen Tero, Vingerhoets Loes
Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 13;9:735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00735. eCollection 2018.
A growing number of parents delay vaccinations or are deciding not to vaccinate their children altogether. This increases the risk of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases and disrupting herd immunity, and also impairs the trust in the capacities of health care systems to protect people. Vaccine hesitancy is related to a range of both psychological and demographic determinants, such as attitudes toward vaccinations, social norms, and trust in science. Our aim is to understand those determinants in parents, because they are a special group in this issue-they act as proxy decision makers for their children, who are unable to decide for themselves. The fact that deciding to vaccinate is a socially forced choice that concerns a child's health makes vaccine-related decisions highly important and involving for parents. This high involvement might lead to parents overemphasizing the potential side effects that they know to be vaccine-related, and by amplifying those, parents are more focused on the potential outcomes of vaccine-related decisions, which can yield specific pattern of the outcome bias. We propose two related studies to investigate factors which promote vaccine hesitancy, protective factors that determine parental vaccination decisions, and outcome bias in parental vaccination intentions. We will explore demographic and psychological factors, and test parental involvement related to vaccine hesitancy using an online battery in a correlation panel design study. The second study is an experimental study, in which we will investigate the moderating role of parents' high involvement in the specific domain of vaccination decision making. We expect that higher involvement among parents, compared to non-parents, will shape the pattern of the proneness to outcome bias. The studies will be conducted across eight countries in Europe and Asia (Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, and the United Kingdom), rendering findings that will aid with understanding the underlying mechanisms of vaccine hesitancy and paving the way for developing interventions custom-made for parents.
越来越多的家长推迟给孩子接种疫苗,或者干脆决定不给孩子接种。这增加了感染疫苗可预防疾病以及破坏群体免疫的风险,也损害了人们对医疗保健系统保护能力的信任。疫苗犹豫与一系列心理和人口因素有关,比如对疫苗接种的态度、社会规范以及对科学的信任。我们的目标是了解家长中的这些因素,因为他们在这个问题上是一个特殊群体——他们作为孩子的代理决策者,而孩子无法自己做决定。决定接种疫苗是一个涉及孩子健康的社会强制选择,这一事实使得与疫苗相关的决定对家长来说非常重要且意义重大。这种高度关注可能导致家长过度强调他们已知的与疫苗相关的潜在副作用,并且通过放大这些副作用,家长更关注与疫苗相关决定的潜在结果,这可能会产生特定的结果偏差模式。我们提出两项相关研究,以调查促使疫苗犹豫的因素、决定家长接种疫苗决策的保护因素以及家长接种疫苗意愿中的结果偏差。我们将探索人口和心理因素,并在相关面板设计研究中使用在线测试组来测试与疫苗犹豫相关的家长关注度。第二项研究是一项实验研究,我们将在其中调查家长的高度关注在疫苗接种决策特定领域中的调节作用。我们预计,与非家长相比,家长的更高关注度将塑造结果偏差倾向的模式。这些研究将在欧洲和亚洲的八个国家(芬兰、德国、中国香港、荷兰、塞尔维亚、斯洛文尼亚、西班牙和英国)进行,得出的研究结果将有助于理解疫苗犹豫的潜在机制,并为制定针对家长的定制干预措施铺平道路。