Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Acute Leukemia Working Party, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris Study Office, Paris, France.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2091.
The optimal treatment approach to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who relapse after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains elusive. No randomized clinical trial comparing survival outcomes of a second allo-HCT (allo-HCT2) vs donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has been conducted to date.
To compare overall survival (OS) after an allo-HCT2 or DLI in relapsed AML after a first allo-HCT.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective registry study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation involving 418 adults who received an allo-HCT2 (n = 137) or DLI (n = 281) for postallograft-relapsed AML. Analysis was assessed on the principle of intent-to-first received intervention. The data were collected from November 21, 2015, to May 15, 2017, and analysis was performed June 1, 2017.
Number of patients with relapsed AML who are alive after 2 years and 5 years from receiving an allo-HCT2 or DLI.
Of the 418 patients, 228 (54.5%) were men; mean age was 46.2 years (interquartile range, 36.5-56.9 years). There was no apparent difference in OS whether an allo-HCT2 or DLI was prescribed (2-year OS with allo-HCT2, 26%; 5-year OS with allo-HCT2, 19%; 2-year OS with DLI, 25%; 5-year OS with DLI, 15%; P = .86). Overall survival was better if either of these procedures was offered when the patient was in complete remission (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.74; P < .001). Conversely, OS was low for patients relapsing within less than 6 months after an allo-HCT1, regardless of the treatment prescribed (5-year OS: allo-HCT2, 9%; 95% CI, 1%-17% vs DLI, 4%; 95% CI, 1%-8%; P = .86).
Heterogeneity of the patient-, disease-, and treatment-related characteristics limit the ability to recommend one approach over another. Findings of this study highlight that best outcomes seem to be achieved in patients relapsing 6 or more months from an allo-HCT1 or those in complete remission at the time of either allo-HCT2 or DLI.
异体造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后复发的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的最佳治疗方法仍难以捉摸。迄今为止,尚无比较第二次 allo-HCT(allo-HCT2)与供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)的生存结果的随机临床试验。
比较 allo-HCT2 或 DLI 在首次 allo-HCT 后复发的 AML 中的总生存(OS)。
设计、地点和参与者:这项由欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会急性白血病工作组进行的回顾性登记研究纳入了 418 名接受 allo-HCT2(n=137)或 DLI(n=281)治疗移植后复发 AML 的成年人。分析基于接受干预的意向原则。数据于 2015 年 11 月 21 日至 2017 年 5 月 15 日采集,分析于 2017 年 6 月 1 日进行。
接受 allo-HCT2 或 DLI 后 2 年和 5 年仍存活的复发 AML 患者数量。
在 418 名患者中,228 名(54.5%)为男性;平均年龄为 46.2 岁(四分位距,36.5-56.9 岁)。无论给予 allo-HCT2 还是 DLI,OS 均无明显差异(allo-HCT2 的 2 年 OS,26%;5 年 OS,19%;DLI 的 2 年 OS,25%;5 年 OS,15%;P=0.86)。如果患者处于完全缓解状态时接受其中任何一种治疗,OS 更好(风险比,0.55;95%CI,0.41-0.74;P<0.001)。相反,对于 allo-HCT1 后 6 个月内复发的患者,OS 较低,无论给予何种治疗(5 年 OS:allo-HCT2,9%;95%CI,1%-17% vs DLI,4%;95%CI,1%-8%;P=0.86)。
患者、疾病和治疗相关特征的异质性限制了推荐一种方法而不是另一种方法的能力。本研究结果表明,在 allo-HCT1 后 6 个月或以上复发的患者或在接受 allo-HCT2 或 DLI 时处于完全缓解的患者中,似乎可以获得最佳结局。