Suppr超能文献

异基因造血干细胞移植与供者淋巴细胞输注与急性髓系白血病复发患者总生存的关系。

Association of Second Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant vs Donor Lymphocyte Infusion With Overall Survival in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapse.

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

Acute Leukemia Working Party, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris Study Office, Paris, France.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2091.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The optimal treatment approach to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who relapse after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains elusive. No randomized clinical trial comparing survival outcomes of a second allo-HCT (allo-HCT2) vs donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has been conducted to date.

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival (OS) after an allo-HCT2 or DLI in relapsed AML after a first allo-HCT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective registry study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation involving 418 adults who received an allo-HCT2 (n = 137) or DLI (n = 281) for postallograft-relapsed AML. Analysis was assessed on the principle of intent-to-first received intervention. The data were collected from November 21, 2015, to May 15, 2017, and analysis was performed June 1, 2017.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Number of patients with relapsed AML who are alive after 2 years and 5 years from receiving an allo-HCT2 or DLI.

RESULTS

Of the 418 patients, 228 (54.5%) were men; mean age was 46.2 years (interquartile range, 36.5-56.9 years). There was no apparent difference in OS whether an allo-HCT2 or DLI was prescribed (2-year OS with allo-HCT2, 26%; 5-year OS with allo-HCT2, 19%; 2-year OS with DLI, 25%; 5-year OS with DLI, 15%; P = .86). Overall survival was better if either of these procedures was offered when the patient was in complete remission (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.74; P < .001). Conversely, OS was low for patients relapsing within less than 6 months after an allo-HCT1, regardless of the treatment prescribed (5-year OS: allo-HCT2, 9%; 95% CI, 1%-17% vs DLI, 4%; 95% CI, 1%-8%; P = .86).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Heterogeneity of the patient-, disease-, and treatment-related characteristics limit the ability to recommend one approach over another. Findings of this study highlight that best outcomes seem to be achieved in patients relapsing 6 or more months from an allo-HCT1 or those in complete remission at the time of either allo-HCT2 or DLI.

摘要

重要性

异体造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后复发的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的最佳治疗方法仍难以捉摸。迄今为止,尚无比较第二次 allo-HCT(allo-HCT2)与供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)的生存结果的随机临床试验。

目的

比较 allo-HCT2 或 DLI 在首次 allo-HCT 后复发的 AML 中的总生存(OS)。

设计、地点和参与者:这项由欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会急性白血病工作组进行的回顾性登记研究纳入了 418 名接受 allo-HCT2(n=137)或 DLI(n=281)治疗移植后复发 AML 的成年人。分析基于接受干预的意向原则。数据于 2015 年 11 月 21 日至 2017 年 5 月 15 日采集,分析于 2017 年 6 月 1 日进行。

主要结局和测量

接受 allo-HCT2 或 DLI 后 2 年和 5 年仍存活的复发 AML 患者数量。

结果

在 418 名患者中,228 名(54.5%)为男性;平均年龄为 46.2 岁(四分位距,36.5-56.9 岁)。无论给予 allo-HCT2 还是 DLI,OS 均无明显差异(allo-HCT2 的 2 年 OS,26%;5 年 OS,19%;DLI 的 2 年 OS,25%;5 年 OS,15%;P=0.86)。如果患者处于完全缓解状态时接受其中任何一种治疗,OS 更好(风险比,0.55;95%CI,0.41-0.74;P<0.001)。相反,对于 allo-HCT1 后 6 个月内复发的患者,OS 较低,无论给予何种治疗(5 年 OS:allo-HCT2,9%;95%CI,1%-17% vs DLI,4%;95%CI,1%-8%;P=0.86)。

结论和相关性

患者、疾病和治疗相关特征的异质性限制了推荐一种方法而不是另一种方法的能力。本研究结果表明,在 allo-HCT1 后 6 个月或以上复发的患者或在接受 allo-HCT2 或 DLI 时处于完全缓解的患者中,似乎可以获得最佳结局。

相似文献

2
Second Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Sep;30(9):905.e1-905.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.019. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
8
Outcomes of Second Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Aug;27(8):689-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting PD-1 for HCT relapse: an immunologic knife's edge.
Blood Adv. 2025 Aug 12;9(15):3907-3908. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016709.
2
Future perspectives on novel CAR-T therapeutics beyond CD19 and BCMA in onco-hematology.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 14;16:1592377. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1592377. eCollection 2025.
3
Second allogeneic transplantation in relapsed acute leukemia - a risk worth taking?
Ann Hematol. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06468-x.
4
[Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation].
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00108-025-01948-8.
7
The transcription factor HOXA9 induces expression of the chromatin modifier SMYD3 to drive leukemogenesis.
J Biol Chem. 2025 May 30;301(7):110320. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110320.
9
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor maintenance therapy after stem cell transplantation for FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 28;4(4):CD016090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016090.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Midostaurin plus Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with a FLT3 Mutation.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):454-464. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614359. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1154-1161. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7091. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
3
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with AML not achieving remission: potentially curative therapy.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Aug;52(8):1083-1090. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.8. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
4
Validation of risk stratification models in acute myeloid leukemia using sequencing-based molecular profiling.
Leukemia. 2017 Oct;31(10):2029-2036. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
5
Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.
Blood. 2017 Jan 26;129(4):424-447. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验