Légaré France, Adekpedjou Rhéda, Stacey Dawn, Turcotte Stéphane, Kryworuchko Jennifer, Graham Ian D, Lyddiatt Anne, Politi Mary C, Thomson Richard, Elwyn Glyn, Donner-Banzhoff Norbert
Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, Québec, Canada, G1J 0A4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review.
To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.
Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.
We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.19; 2 studies; N = 266); improve physical (SMD 0.08, -0.37 to 0.54; 1 study; N = 75) or mental health-related QOL (SMD 0.01, -0.44 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 75), affect consultation length (SMD 3.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 4.01; 1 study; N = 36) or costs (no data available) and may make little or no difference to decision regret (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.33; 1 study; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain whether interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.60; 1 study; N = 20); (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.04; 1 study; N = 134) or reported by patients (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.32; 1 study; N = 150 ) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. There was insuffient information to determine the effects on decision regret, physical or mental health-related quality of life, or consultation length or costs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether any interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals are effective because the certainty of the evidence is low or very low.
共同决策(SDM)是患者、重要他人或两者与一名或多名医疗保健专业人员共同做出医疗选择的过程。然而,它在实践中尚未得到广泛应用。这是本Cochrane系统评价的第二次更新。
确定增加医疗保健专业人员使用SDM的干预措施的有效性。我们考虑了针对患者的干预措施、针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施以及针对两者的干预措施。
我们于2017年6月15日检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和其他五个数据库。我们还检索了两个临床试验注册库和相关会议的论文集。我们检查了参考文献列表并联系了研究作者以识别其他研究。
随机和非随机试验、前后对照研究以及中断时间序列研究,评估增加SDM使用的干预措施,其中主要结局使用基于观察者或患者报告的测量方法进行评估。
我们采用了Cochrane期望的标准方法程序。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了87项研究(45641名患者和3113名医疗保健专业人员),这些研究主要在美国、德国、加拿大和荷兰进行。在防止污染方面,偏倚风险高或不明确;在患者基线特征差异方面,偏倚风险低;在其他领域,偏倚风险不明确。44项研究评估了针对患者的干预措施。这些措施包括决策辅助工具、患者激活、问题提示列表以及患者培训等,单独实施(单一干预)或联合实施(多方面干预)。证据的确定性非常低。与常规护理相比,针对患者的干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(标准化均数差(SMD)0.54,95%置信区间(CI)-0.13至1.22;4项研究;N = 424)还是患者报告(SMD 0.32,95%CI 0.16至0.48;9项研究;N = 1386;风险差(RD)-0.09,95%CI -0.19至0.01;6项研究;N = 754),是否能减少决策后悔(SMD -0.10,95%CI -0.39至0.19;1项研究;N = 212),改善身体(SMD 0.00,95%CI -0.36至0.36;1项研究;N = 116)或心理健康相关生活质量(QOL)(SMD 0.10,95%CI -0.26至0.46;1项研究;N = 116),影响咨询时长(SMD 0.10,95%CI -0.39至0.58;2项研究;N = 224)或成本(SMD 0.82,95%CI 0.42至1.22;1项研究;N = 105)。与同类型干预措施相比,针对患者的干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD 0.88,95%CI 0.39至1.37;3项研究;N = 271)还是患者报告(SMD 0.03,95%CI -0.18至0.24;11项研究;N = 1906);(RD 0.03,95%CI -0.02至0.08;10项研究;N = 2272);是否影响咨询时长(SMD -0.65,95%CI -1.29至-0.00;1项研究;N = 39)或成本。未报告关于决策后悔、身体或心理健康相关QOL的数据。15项研究评估了针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施。这些措施包括教育会议、教育材料、教育外展访问和提醒等。证据的确定性非常低。与常规护理相比,这些干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD 0.70,95%CI 0.21至1.19;6项研究;N = 479)还是患者报告(SMD 0.03,95%CI -0.15至0.20;5项研究;N = 5772);(RD 0.01,95%CI -0.03至0.06;2项研究;N = 6303);是否能减少决策后悔(SMD 0.29,95%CI 0.07至0.51;1项研究;N = 326),影响咨询时长(SMD 0.51,95%CI 0.21至0.81;1项研究,N = 175),成本(无可用数据)或身体健康相关QOL(SMD 0.16,95%CI -0.05至0.36;1项研究;N = 359)。心理健康相关QOL可能略有改善(SMD 0.28,95%CI 0.07至0.49;1项研究,N = 359;低确定性证据)。与同类型干预措施相比,针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD -0.30,95%CI -1.19至0.59;1项研究;N = 20)还是患者报告(SMD 0.24,95%CI -0.10至0.58;2项研究;N = 1459),因为证据的确定性非常低。没有足够的信息来确定对决策后悔、身体或心理健康相关QOL、咨询时长或成本的影响。28项研究针对患者和医疗保健专业人员两者。这些干预措施采用了患者介导和医疗保健专业人员指导干预措施的组合。基于低确定性证据,与常规护理相比,这些干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD 1.10,95%CI 0.42至1.79;6项研究;N = 1270)还是患者报告(SMD 0.13,95%CI -0.02至0.28;7项研究;N = 1479);(RD -0.01,95%CI -0.20至0.19;2项研究;N = 266);是否能改善身体(SMD 0.08,-0.37至0.54;1项研究;N = 75)或心理健康相关QOL(SMD 0.01,-0.44至0.46;