Suppr超能文献

提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.

作者信息

Légaré France, Adekpedjou Rhéda, Stacey Dawn, Turcotte Stéphane, Kryworuchko Jennifer, Graham Ian D, Lyddiatt Anne, Politi Mary C, Thomson Richard, Elwyn Glyn, Donner-Banzhoff Norbert

机构信息

Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, Québec, Canada, G1J 0A4.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.19; 2 studies; N = 266); improve physical (SMD 0.08, -0.37 to 0.54; 1 study; N = 75) or mental health-related QOL (SMD 0.01, -0.44 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 75), affect consultation length (SMD 3.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 4.01; 1 study; N = 36) or costs (no data available) and may make little or no difference to decision regret (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.33; 1 study; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain whether interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.60; 1 study; N = 20); (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.04; 1 study; N = 134) or reported by patients (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.32; 1 study; N = 150 ) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. There was insuffient information to determine the effects on decision regret, physical or mental health-related quality of life, or consultation length or costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether any interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals are effective because the certainty of the evidence is low or very low.

摘要

背景

共同决策(SDM)是患者、重要他人或两者与一名或多名医疗保健专业人员共同做出医疗选择的过程。然而,它在实践中尚未得到广泛应用。这是本Cochrane系统评价的第二次更新。

目的

确定增加医疗保健专业人员使用SDM的干预措施的有效性。我们考虑了针对患者的干预措施、针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施以及针对两者的干预措施。

检索方法

我们于2017年6月15日检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和其他五个数据库。我们还检索了两个临床试验注册库和相关会议的论文集。我们检查了参考文献列表并联系了研究作者以识别其他研究。

选择标准

随机和非随机试验、前后对照研究以及中断时间序列研究,评估增加SDM使用的干预措施,其中主要结局使用基于观察者或患者报告的测量方法进行评估。

数据收集与分析

我们采用了Cochrane期望的标准方法程序。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

我们纳入了87项研究(45641名患者和3113名医疗保健专业人员),这些研究主要在美国、德国、加拿大和荷兰进行。在防止污染方面,偏倚风险高或不明确;在患者基线特征差异方面,偏倚风险低;在其他领域,偏倚风险不明确。44项研究评估了针对患者的干预措施。这些措施包括决策辅助工具、患者激活、问题提示列表以及患者培训等,单独实施(单一干预)或联合实施(多方面干预)。证据的确定性非常低。与常规护理相比,针对患者的干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(标准化均数差(SMD)0.54,95%置信区间(CI)-0.13至1.22;4项研究;N = 424)还是患者报告(SMD 0.32,95%CI 0.16至0.48;9项研究;N = 1386;风险差(RD)-0.09,95%CI -0.19至0.01;6项研究;N = 754),是否能减少决策后悔(SMD -0.10,95%CI -0.39至0.19;1项研究;N = 212),改善身体(SMD 0.00,95%CI -0.36至0.36;1项研究;N = 116)或心理健康相关生活质量(QOL)(SMD 0.10,95%CI -0.26至0.46;1项研究;N = 116),影响咨询时长(SMD 0.10,95%CI -0.39至0.58;2项研究;N = 224)或成本(SMD 0.82,95%CI 0.42至1.22;1项研究;N = 105)。与同类型干预措施相比,针对患者的干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD 0.88,95%CI 0.39至1.37;3项研究;N = 271)还是患者报告(SMD 0.03,95%CI -0.18至0.24;11项研究;N = 1906);(RD 0.03,95%CI -0.02至0.08;10项研究;N = 2272);是否影响咨询时长(SMD -0.65,95%CI -1.29至-0.00;1项研究;N = 39)或成本。未报告关于决策后悔、身体或心理健康相关QOL的数据。15项研究评估了针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施。这些措施包括教育会议、教育材料、教育外展访问和提醒等。证据的确定性非常低。与常规护理相比,这些干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD 0.70,95%CI 0.21至1.19;6项研究;N = 479)还是患者报告(SMD 0.03,95%CI -0.15至0.20;5项研究;N = 5772);(RD 0.01,95%CI -0.03至0.06;2项研究;N = 6303);是否能减少决策后悔(SMD 0.29,95%CI 0.07至0.51;1项研究;N = 326),影响咨询时长(SMD 0.51,95%CI 0.21至0.81;1项研究,N = 175),成本(无可用数据)或身体健康相关QOL(SMD 0.16,95%CI -0.05至0.36;1项研究;N = 359)。心理健康相关QOL可能略有改善(SMD 0.28,95%CI 0.07至0.49;1项研究,N = 359;低确定性证据)。与同类型干预措施相比,针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD -0.30,95%CI -1.19至0.59;1项研究;N = 20)还是患者报告(SMD 0.24,95%CI -0.10至0.58;2项研究;N = 1459),因为证据的确定性非常低。没有足够的信息来确定对决策后悔、身体或心理健康相关QOL、咨询时长或成本的影响。28项研究针对患者和医疗保健专业人员两者。这些干预措施采用了患者介导和医疗保健专业人员指导干预措施的组合。基于低确定性证据,与常规护理相比,这些干预措施是否能增加SDM尚不确定,无论是通过观察测量(SMD 1.10,95%CI 0.42至1.79;6项研究;N = 1270)还是患者报告(SMD 0.13,95%CI -0.02至0.28;7项研究;N = 1479);(RD -0.01,95%CI -0.20至0.19;2项研究;N = 266);是否能改善身体(SMD 0.08,-0.37至0.54;1项研究;N = 75)或心理健康相关QOL(SMD 0.01,-0.44至0.46;

相似文献

1
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
2
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
3
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2.
4
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.
5
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
6
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 3;9(9):CD008165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub4.
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 26;9(9):CD013357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013357.pub2.
9
Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 5;7(7):CD011775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011775.pub2.
10
Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD012463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012463.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving shared decision-making in bronchiectasis.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Sep 3;12(1):e003049. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003049.
2
Factors impacting informed decision-making for patients with pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 30;33(9):825. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09878-9.
4
Clinician Needs and Requirements for a Decision Aid Navigator: Qualitative Study.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 21;12:e69756. doi: 10.2196/69756.
6
Measuring health confidence: benefits to patients, clinicians and healthcare providers.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 17;14(3):e003134. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003134.
7
Advance care planning for adults with cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 30;7(7):CD016227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016227.
9
Advancing the Contemporary Multidisciplinary Heart Valve Team: Update on Priorities for Clinicians and Programs.
Struct Heart. 2025 May 12;9(7):100490. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100490. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
Evaluation of Real-World Quality of Asthma Care According to the Spanish Consensus Protocol: The AsmaNET Project (ESR-20-20897).
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Jul 17;18:1119-1127. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S526389. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
CanDirect: Effectiveness of a Telephone-Supported Depression Self-Care Intervention for Cancer Survivors.
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;39(10):1150-1161. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01802. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Shared decision making in 2017: International accomplishments in policy, research and implementation.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
An evaluation of two interventions to enhance patient-physician communication using the observer OPTION measure of shared decision making.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Oct;100(10):1910-1917. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 1.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
8
Using m-health tools to reduce the misuse of opioid pain relievers.
Inj Prev. 2019 Aug;25(4):334-339. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042319. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
9
Should I continue taking my acid reflux medication? Design of a pilot before/after study evaluating a patient decision aid.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2016 Nov 30;150(1):19-23. doi: 10.1177/1715163516679425. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb.
10
Does the Use of a Decision Aid Improve Decision Making in Prosthetic Heart Valve Selection? A Multicenter Randomized Trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Feb;10(2). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003178. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验