School of Integrated Design Engineering, Keio University, Japan.
Sohyaku, Innovative Research Division, Research Unit/Immunology & Inflammation, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Japan.
Microvasc Res. 2019 Mar;122:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Every organ demonstrates specific vascular characteristics and functions maintained by interactions of endothelial cells (ECs) and parenchymal cells. Particularly, brain ECs play a central role in the formation of a functional blood brain barrier (BBB). Organ-specific ECs have their own morphological features, and organ specificity must be considered when investigating interactions between ECs and other cell types constituting a target organ. Here we constructed angiogenesis-based microvascular networks with perivascular cells in a microfluidic device setting by coculturing ECs and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Furthermore, we analyzed endothelial barrier functions as well as fundamental morphology, an essential step to build an in vitro BBB model. In particular, we used both brain microvascular ECs (BMECs) and human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) to test if organ specificity of ECs affects the formation processes and endothelial barrier functions of an engineered microvascular network. We found that microvascular formation processes differed by the source of ECs. HUVECs formed more extensive microvascular networks compared to BMECs while no differences were observed between BMECs and HUVECs in terms of both the microvascular diameter and the number of pericytes peripherally associated with the microvasculatures. To compare the endothelial barrier functions of each type of EC, we performed fluorescence dextran perfusion on constructed microvasculatures. The permeability coefficient of BMEC microvasculatures was significantly lower than that of HUVEC microvasculatures. In addition, there were significant differences in terms of tight junction protein expression. These results suggest that the organ source of ECs influences the properties of engineered microvasculature and thus is a factor to be considered in the design of organ-specific cell culture models.
每个器官都表现出特定的血管特征和功能,这些特征和功能是由内皮细胞(ECs)和实质细胞相互作用维持的。特别是,脑 ECs 在形成功能性血脑屏障(BBB)中发挥核心作用。器官特异性 ECs 具有其自身的形态特征,在研究构成靶器官的 ECs 与其他细胞类型之间的相互作用时,必须考虑器官特异性。在这里,我们通过共培养 ECs 和间充质干细胞(MSCs),在微流控装置中构建了基于血管生成的具有血管周细胞的微血管网络。此外,我们分析了内皮屏障功能以及基本形态,这是构建体外 BBB 模型的重要步骤。特别是,我们使用脑微血管内皮细胞(BMECs)和人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVECs)来测试 ECs 的器官特异性是否会影响工程化微血管网络的形成过程和内皮屏障功能。我们发现,ECs 的来源会影响微血管形成过程。与 BMECs 相比,HUVECs 形成了更广泛的微血管网络,而在微血管直径和周细胞数量方面,BMECs 和 HUVECs 之间没有差异。为了比较每种类型 EC 的内皮屏障功能,我们在构建的微血管上进行了荧光葡聚糖灌注。BMEC 微血管的渗透率系数明显低于 HUVEC 微血管。此外,紧密连接蛋白表达也存在显著差异。这些结果表明,ECs 的器官来源会影响工程化微血管的特性,因此在设计器官特异性细胞培养模型时需要考虑这一因素。