Service of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, CHI Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 94190 Villeneuve Saint Georges, France.
Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine DAL, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CHUV, Service of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Regenerative Therapy Unit (UTR), CHUV-EPCR/Croisettes 22, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
Viruses. 2018 Dec 28;11(1):18. doi: 10.3390/v11010018.
The history of phage therapy started with its first clinical application in 1919 and continues its development to this day. Phages continue to lack any market approval in Western medicine as a recognized drug, but are increasingly used as an experimental therapy for the compassionate treatment of patients experiencing antibiotic failure. The few formal experimental phage clinical trials that have been completed to date have produced inconclusive results on the efficacy of phage therapy, which contradicts the many successful treatment outcomes observed in historical accounts and recent individual case reports. It would therefore be wise to identify why such a discordance exists between trials and compassionate use in order to better develop future phage treatment and clinical applications. The multitude of observations reported over the years in the literature constitutes an invaluable experience, and we add to this by presenting a number of cases of patients treated compassionately with phages throughout the past decade with a focus on osteoarticular infections. Additionally, an abundance of scientific literature into phage-related areas is transforming our knowledge base, creating a greater understanding that should be applied for future clinical applications. Due to the increasing number of treatment failures anticipatedfrom the perspective of a possible post-antibiotic era, we believe that the introduction of bacteriophages into the therapeutic arsenal seems a scientifically sound and eminently practicable consideration today as a substitute or adjuvant to antibiotic therapy.
噬菌体疗法的历史可以追溯到 1919 年的首次临床应用,并一直延续到今天。噬菌体在西方医学中仍然缺乏任何作为公认药物的市场批准,但作为一种实验性疗法,越来越多地用于同情治疗抗生素治疗失败的患者。迄今为止,已完成的少数正式的噬菌体临床实验在噬菌体疗法的疗效方面产生了不确定的结果,这与历史记载和最近的个别病例报告中观察到的许多成功治疗结果相矛盾。因此,明智的做法是确定为什么试验和同情使用之间存在这种不一致,以便更好地开发未来的噬菌体治疗和临床应用。多年来在文献中报告的大量观察结果构成了宝贵的经验,我们通过介绍过去十年中使用噬菌体治疗的一些患者的案例来增加这方面的知识,重点是骨关节炎感染。此外,大量与噬菌体相关的科学文献正在改变我们的知识库,使我们对未来的临床应用有了更深入的了解。由于从可能的后抗生素时代的角度来看,预计会有越来越多的治疗失败,因此我们认为,将噬菌体引入治疗武器库似乎是一个科学合理且非常可行的考虑因素,今天可以作为抗生素治疗的替代或辅助手段。