Suppr超能文献

阅读纸质书和电子书后泪膜变化及眼部症状:一项交叉研究。

Tear film change and ocular symptoms after reading printed book and electronic book: a crossover study.

作者信息

Prabhasawat Pinnita, Pinitpuwadol Warinyupa, Angsriprasert Dawisa, Chonpimai Pratuangsri, Saiman Manutsawin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

出版信息

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;63(2):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-00648-1. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare tear film changes and ocular symptoms after reading an electronic book (e-book) and a printed book.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical and experimental.

METHODS

Crossover study was conducted in 30 healthy volunteers, some of whom read an e-book and others a printed book for 20 minutes and then switched the following week. Tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), fluorescein break up time (FBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining score, and questionnaires about seven ocular symptoms were evaluated before and after reading by both reading methods.

RESULTS

After reading an e-book, FBUT and NIBUT were significantly decreased (p<0.001for both). Similar to printed book readers (p=0.006, p=0.04, respectively). TMH and corneal and conjunctival staining score showed no significant differences in either group. Comparing the two groups, the e-book group showed more decrease in TMH, FBUT, and NIBUT (p>0.05). Ocular symptoms were significantly increased in both groups. The e-book group showed more increase in all symptoms, but only tearing (p=0.03) and burning sensation (p=0.02) were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Reading an e-book affected tear film instability and significantly increased burning sensation and tearing to a larger extend than reading a printed book.

摘要

目的

评估并比较阅读电子书和纸质书后泪膜变化及眼部症状。

研究设计

临床与实验研究。

方法

对30名健康志愿者进行交叉研究,其中一些人阅读电子书,另一些人阅读纸质书20分钟,然后在下周交换。通过两种阅读方式,在阅读前后评估泪河高度(TMH)、非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)、荧光素泪膜破裂时间(FBUT)、角膜和结膜染色评分以及关于七种眼部症状的问卷。

结果

阅读电子书后,FBUT和NIBUT显著降低(两者均p<0.001)。与阅读纸质书的读者相似(分别为p=0.006,p=0.04)。两组的TMH以及角膜和结膜染色评分均无显著差异。比较两组,电子书组的TMH、FBUT和NIBUT下降更多(p>0.05)。两组的眼部症状均显著增加。电子书组所有症状增加更多,但仅流泪(p=0.03)和烧灼感(p=0.02)有显著差异。

结论

阅读电子书会影响泪膜稳定性,并且比阅读纸质书更显著地增加烧灼感和流泪程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验