Pharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;81:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
Treatment of bone and joint infections can be challenging as antibiotics should penetrate through the rigid bone structure and into the synovial space. Several pharmacokinetic studies measured the extent of penetration of different antibiotics into bone and joint tissues. This review discusses the results of these studies and compares them with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of common pathogens implicated in bone and joint infections in order to determine which antibiotics may have a greater potential in the treatment of such infections. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated as data were available. More than 30 antibiotics were evaluated. Overall, most antibiotics, including amoxicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cloxacillin, cephalosporins, carbapenems, aztreonam, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, doxycycline, vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, fosfomycin, rifampin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin, showed good penetration into bone and joint tissues reaching concentrations exceeding the MIC and/or MIC breakpoints of common bone and joint infections pathogens. Few exceptions include penicillin and metronidazole which showed a lower than optimum penetration into bones, and the latter as well as flucloxacillin had poor profiles in terms of joint space penetration. Of note, studies on joint space penetration were fewer than studies on bone tissue penetration. Although clinical studies in osteomyelitis and septic arthritis are not available for all of the evaluated antibiotics, these pharmacokinetic results indicate that agents with good penetration profiles would have a potential utilization in such infections.
治疗骨和关节感染具有挑战性,因为抗生素应该穿透坚硬的骨结构并进入滑膜腔。几项药代动力学研究测量了不同抗生素进入骨和关节组织的渗透程度。这篇综述讨论了这些研究的结果,并将其与常见的骨和关节感染病原体的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 进行了比较,以确定哪些抗生素在治疗此类感染方面可能具有更大的潜力。临床结果也进行了评估,因为有数据可用。评估了超过 30 种抗生素。总体而言,大多数抗生素,包括阿莫西林、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、氯唑西林、头孢菌素类、碳青霉烯类、氨曲南、氨基糖苷类、氟喹诺酮类、多西环素、万古霉素、利奈唑胺、达托霉素、克林霉素、复方磺胺甲噁唑、磷霉素、利福平、达巴万星和奥利万星,都显示出良好的骨和关节组织渗透能力,达到了超过 MIC 和/或常见骨和关节感染病原体的 MIC 折点的浓度。少数例外包括青霉素和甲硝唑,它们在骨骼中的渗透低于最佳水平,后者以及氟氯西林在关节空间渗透方面的表现不佳。值得注意的是,关于关节空间渗透的研究少于关于骨组织渗透的研究。尽管并非所有评估的抗生素都有针对骨髓炎和化脓性关节炎的临床研究,但这些药代动力学结果表明,具有良好渗透特性的药物可能在这些感染中得到应用。